Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25844043›Full record

ArticleNew journal of physics2014

Compression stiffening of brain and its effect on mechanosensing by glioma cells.

Katarzyna Pogoda, LiKang Chin, Penelope C Georges, FitzRoy J Byfield, Robert Bucki, Richard Kim, Michael Weaver, Rebecca G Wells, Cezary Marcinkiewicz, Paul A Janmey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New journal of physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Measurement of Residual Stress in the Brain.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanical signatures in cancer metastasis.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katarzyna PogodaInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
LiKang ChinInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Penelope C GeorgesInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
FitzRoy J ByfieldInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert BuckiInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; The Faculty of Health Sciences of the Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Richard KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael WeaverDepartment of Neurosurgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rebecca G WellsDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cezary MarcinkiewiczCoE Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paul A JanmeyInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3340 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; Departments of Physiology and Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Structural basis of the specific protein-protein interactions underlying IF assemP01GM096971 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDMAN, ROBERT D · 2011 to 2021
$16.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM096971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cell types, including neurons, astrocytes and other cells of the central nervous system respond to changes in extracellular matrix or substrate viscoelasticity, and increased tissue stiffness is a hallmark of several disease states including fibrosis and some types of cancers. Whether the malignant tissue in brain, an organ that lacks the protein-based filamentous extracellular matrix of other organs, exhibits the same macroscopic stiffening characteristic of breast, colon, pancreatic, and other tumors is not known. In this study we show that glioma cells like normal astrocytes, respond strongly in vitro to substrate stiffness in the range of 100 to 2000 Pa, but that macroscopic (mm to cm) tissue samples isolated from human glioma tumors have elastic moduli on the order of 200 Pa that are indistinguishable from those of normal brain. However, both normal brain and glioma tissues increase their shear elastic moduli under modest uniaxial compression, and glioma tissue stiffens more strongly under compression than does normal brain. These findings suggest that local tissue stiffness has the potential to alter glial cell function, and that stiffness changes in brain tumors might arise not from increased deposition or crosslinking of collagen-rich extracellular matrix but from pressure gradients that form within the tumors in vivo.

Indexed as

astrocytebrain rheologygliomamechanosensingviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID25844043
PMCPMC4380293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.