ArticleIrish journal of medical science2016
Burkitt leukaemia/lymphoma: R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC remains gold standard treatment in BL.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological features of primary thyroid Burkitt's lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diagnostic pathology · 2020Pooled it
- Burkitt's lymphoma: an unexpected cause of dental pain.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSporadic Burkitt lymphoma (BL), characterised by translocation-associated C-MYC upregulation is a rare, aggressive lymphoma with a cure rate up to 90 % using the R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC (RCRI) protocol. RCRI is active in HIV-associated BL in combination with HAART. The WHO classification system defines lymphomas intermediate between DLBCL and BL, in which lymphomas with t(14;18)(q32;q21) and C-MYC-carrying translocation, i.e. 'double-hit' are included (BL-DH), and these patients are conventionally treated with RCRI.
resultWe describe the SJH experience of 25 patients with BL, BL + HIV and BL-DH treated with RCRI between 2002 and 2011. Twelve BL patients (8M/4F), median age 49.1 years (range 20-73 years); of whom 9 had extensive disease, including 8 with marrow and 2 with CNS involvement. Eleven patients remain in remission at 80.5 months (range 37-147 months) from completion of treatment and one died of progressive BL giving an OS of 91.6 % at 1 year with no late relapses. Eight patients with BL + HIV were treated (6M/2F) with a median age 40.25 years (range 24-64). Five remain in complete remission (CR) at 65 months (range 13-109 months), three patients died, two of progressive disease and one of treatment-associated hepatotoxicity in CR. Five patients with BL-DH were included; (3M/2F), age 47.8 years (range 42-55 years); and all patients died of progressive disease, 4 on RCRI therapy and a further patient despite an allogeneic transplantation.
conclusionThese results confirm that RCRI is an effective treatment in adults with BL and BL + HIV and remains the gold standard against which other regimens should be compared. We confirm the poor prognosis found in BL-DH, indicating new treatment approaches are needed for this sub-group which should be identified at diagnosis by FISH analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.