Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25841997›Full record

SynthesisBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries2015

Preventing childhood scalds within the home: Overview of systematic reviews and a systematic review of primary studies.

Kun Zou, Persephone M Wynn, Philip Miller, Paul Hindmarch, Gosia Majsak-Newman, Ben Young, Mike Hayes, Denise Kendrick

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Preventable Burns from Domestic Tap Water.European burn journal · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mixed-methods process evaluation of SafeTea: a multimedia campaign to prevent hot drink scalds in young children and promote burn first aid.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kun ZouDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, 13th Floor Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: zoukun.jy@outlook.com.
Persephone M WynnDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, 13th Floor Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: persephone.wynn@nottingham.ac.uk.
Philip MillerAcute Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. Electronic address: Philip.Miller@nuh.nhs.uk.
Paul HindmarchGreat North Children's Hospital, Research Unit Level 2, New Victoria Wing, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK. Electronic address: Paul.Hindmarch@nuth.nhs.uk.
Gosia Majsak-NewmanNHS Clinical Research & Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK. Electronic address: gosia.majsak-newman@nnuh.nhs.uk.
Ben YoungDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, 13th Floor Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: ben.young@nottingham.ac.uk.
Mike HayesChild Accident Prevention Trust, Canterbury Court (1.09), 1-3 Brixton Road, London SW9 6DE, UK. Electronic address: mike.hayes@capt.org.uk.
Denise KendrickDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, 13th Floor Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: denise.kendrick@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo synthesise and evaluate the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to prevent scalds in children.

methodsAn overview of systematic reviews (SR) and a SR of primary studies were performed evaluating interventions to prevent scalds in children. A comprehensive literature search was conducted covering various resources up to October 2012. Experimental and controlled observational studies reporting scald injuries, safety practices and safety equipment use were included.

resultsFourteen systematic reviews and 39 primary studies were included. There is little evidence that interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of scalds in children. More evidence was found that inventions are effective in promoting safe hot tap water temperature, especially when home safety education, home safety checks and discounted or free safety equipment including thermometers and thermostatic mixing valves were provided. No consistent evidence was found for the effectiveness of interventions on the safe handling of hot food or drinks nor improving kitchen safety practices.

conclusionEducation, home safety checks along with thermometers or thermostatic mixing valves should be promoted to reduce tap water scalds. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on scald injuries and to disentangle the effects of multifaceted interventions on scald injuries and safety practices.

Indexed as

Accidents, HomeAdolescentBurnsChildChild, PreschoolConsumer Health InformationCookingHumansInfantSanitary EngineeringThermometersChildrenHomePreventionScaldSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25841997
PMCPMC4504085
OpenAlexW2154069662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.