Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25841488›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

A Comprehensive Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis of Hydra Head Regeneration.

Hendrik O Petersen, Stefanie K Höger, Mario Looso, Tobias Lengfeld, Anne Kuhn, Uwe Warnken, Chiemi Nishimiya-Fujisawa, Martina Schnölzer, Marcus Krüger, Suat Özbek and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Extracellular matrix remodeling supportsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Injury-induced MAPK activation triggers body axis formation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hendrik O PetersenCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefanie K HögerCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mario LoosoMax Planck Institute (MPI) for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Tobias LengfeldCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne KuhnCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe WarnkenFunctional Proteome Analysis Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Chiemi Nishimiya-FujisawaOkazaki Institute for Integrative Bioscience, National Institute for Basic Biology, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Japan.
Martina SchnölzerFunctional Proteome Analysis Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus KrügerMax Planck Institute (MPI) for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany CECAD, University of Cologne, Germany.
Suat ÖzbekCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oleg SimakovCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan.
Thomas W HolsteinCentre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany thomas.holstein@cos.uni.heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DENational Institute for Basic Biology · JPUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cnidarian freshwater polyp Hydra sp. exhibits an unparalleled regeneration capacity in the animal kingdom. Using an integrative transcriptomic and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture proteomic/phosphoproteomic approach, we studied stem cell-based regeneration in Hydra polyps. As major contributors to head regeneration, we identified diverse signaling pathways adopted for the regeneration response as well as enriched novel genes. Our global analysis reveals two distinct molecular cascades: an early injury response and a subsequent, signaling driven patterning of the regenerating tissue. A key factor of the initial injury response is a general stabilization of proteins and a net upregulation of transcripts, which is followed by a subsequent activation cascade of signaling molecules including Wnts and transforming growth factor (TGF) beta-related factors. We observed moderate overlap between the factors contributing to proteomic and transcriptomic responses suggesting a decoupled regulation between the transcriptional and translational levels. Our data also indicate that interstitial stem cells and their derivatives (e.g., neurons) have no major role in Hydra head regeneration. Remarkably, we found an enrichment of evolutionarily more recent genes in the early regeneration response, whereas conserved genes are more enriched in the late phase. In addition, genes specific to the early injury response were enriched in transposon insertions. Genetic dynamicity and taxon-specific factors might therefore play a hitherto underestimated role in Hydra regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHydraRegenerationTranscriptomeWnt Signaling PathwayCnidariaevolution of regenerationHydraproteomics and transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID25841488
PMCPMC4833066
OpenAlexW2128571613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.