ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2015
Motion correction options in PET/MRI.
Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Deuterium metabolic imaging beyond the brain: mapping tissue metabolism across the body.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Critical review of partial volume correction methods in PET and SPECT imaging: benefits, pitfalls, challenges, and future outlook.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- (Hybrid) SPECT and PET Technologies.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Tangible advantages of multi-stage brain motion compensation for PET imaging demonstrated in multiple studies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Motion-correction strategies for enhancing whole-body PET imaging.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Inter-pass motion correction for whole-body dynamic PET and parametric imaging.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023Article
- MR-assisted PET respiratory motion correction using deep-learning based short-scan motion fields.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a Dedicated Radiofrequency Carotid PET/MRI Coil.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Advances in Preclinical PET.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2022Review
- Osteopathic Palpation of the Heart.Cureus · 2021Review
- Small animal PET: a review of what we have done and where we are going.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Motion correction for PET data using subspace-based real-time MR imaging in simultaneous PET/MR.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- PET/MRI of atherosclerosis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Dose Reduction in Brain [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Review
- Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Subject motion is unavoidable in clinical and research imaging studies. Breathing is the most important source of motion in whole-body PET and MRI studies, affecting not only thoracic organs but also those in the upper and even lower abdomen. The motion related to the pumping action of the heart is obviously relevant in high-resolution cardiac studies. These two sources of motion are periodic and predictable, at least to a first approximation, which means certain techniques can be used to control the motion (eg, by acquiring the data when the organ of interest is relatively at rest). Additionally, nonperiodic and unpredictable motion can also occur during the scan. One obvious limitation of methods relying on external devices (eg, respiratory bellows or the electrocardiogram signal to monitor the respiratory or cardiac cycle, respectively) to trigger or gate the data acquisition is that the complex motion of internal organs cannot be fully characterized. However, detailed information can be obtained using either the PET or MRI data (or both) allowing the more complete characterization of the motion field so that a motion model can be built. Such a model and the information derived from simple external devices can be used to minimize the effects of motion on the collected data. In the ideal case, all the events recorded during the PET scan would be used to generate a motion-free or corrected PET image. The detailed motion field can be used for this purpose by applying it to the PET data before, during, or after the image reconstruction. Integrating all these methods for motion control, characterization, and correction into a workflow that can be used for routine clinical studies is challenging but could potentially be extremely valuable given the improvement in image quality and reduction of motion-related image artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.