Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25841239›Full record

ArticleGut2015

Altered microbiota in microscopic colitis.

Hans Fischer, Elisabet Holst, Fredrik Karlsson, Cecilia Benoni, Ervin Toth, Martin Olesen, Måns Lindén, Klas Sjöberg

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Microbiome Composition in Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Update on the Epidemiology and Management of Microscopic Colitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Review
  9. Microscopic Colitis: Pathogenesis and Diagnosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Microscopic colitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hans FischerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elisabet HolstDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik KarlssonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cecilia BenoniDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ervin TothDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Martin OlesenDepartment of Pathology, University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Måns LindénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Klas SjöbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseHomeostasisHypoglycemic AgentsIntestinesMetforminMicrobiotaVerrucomicrobiaBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminIMMUNOREGULATIONMICROSCOPIC COLITISMUCUS

Identifiers

PMID25841239
PMCPMC4483788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.