Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016
The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Trial Protocol of Primary Study on Efficacy and Safety of Telesurgery for Patients With Tumors of the Urinary System Using Chinese Independently Developed "MicroHand" Surgical Robot System
Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the Newly Developed Chinese Robotic Surgical System-Micro Hand S: A Controlled, Randomized, Prospective Clinical Study
Research on the Effectiveness and Safety of Remote Surgery of Domestic Surgical Robot System for Urinary System Diseases
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging multi-port soft tissue robotic systems: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robot-assisted upper urinary tract repair surgery using the MP1000 system: a prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Analyzing the emergence of surgical robotics in Africa: a scoping review of pioneering procedures, platforms utilized, and outcome meta-analysis.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
- Exploring robotic total hysterectomies: a multi-site experience with the Senhance Surgical System.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic platforms in gynaecological surgery: past, present, and future.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Analysis of KangDuo-SR-1500 and KangDuo-SR-2000 robotic partial nephrectomy from an operative and ergonomic perspective: a prospective controlled study in porcine models.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- The new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS for total hysterectomy: a pilot study.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Photoacoustic Imaging System Based on Side-Illumination Diffusing Fibers.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- Advanced surgical tool: Progress in clinical application of intelligent surgical robot.Smart medicine · 2022Review
- Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy with a New Robotic Surgical System: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.Journal of endourology · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Versius Robotic Surgical System in Minimal Access Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Senhance robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a case series.Croatian medical journal · 2022Article
- The first European gynaecological procedure with the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS. A total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in a woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2022Article
- Introducing the New Surgical Robot HUGO™ RAS: System Description and Docking Settings for Gynecological Surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- 5G ultra-remote robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in China.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Robotic surgery using SenhanceJournal of robotic surgery · 2020Article
- First experience of pancreaticoduodenectomy using Revo-i in a patient with insulinoma.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2020Article
- Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Article
- Senhance 3-mm robot-assisted surgery: experience on first 14 patients in France.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new robotic TELELAP ALF-X platform in a heterogeneous series of gynecological procedures.
methodsBetween September 2013 and May 2014, 146 patients were enrolled in this Phase II study trial. Patients with presumed benign or borderline adnexal disease, and benign and early stage malignant uterine disease were prospectively included.
resultsMedian age was 52 years (range 19-79 years), and median BMI was 23.7 (range 17.3-34.0 kg/m(2)). Sixty-two patients (32.5%) underwent mono/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or cyst removal (Group A), four patients (2.7%) myomectomy (Group B), 46 patients (31.5%) total hysterectomy (Group C), and 34 (23.3%) endometrial cancer staging (Group D). Median docking time was 7 min (range 3-36). Median OT was 35 min (range 17-145) in the Group A, 40 min (range 10-50) in the Group B, 133 min (range 58-320) in the Group C, and 160 min (range 69-290) in the Group D. Reduction in OT over the study period for hysterectomy (p < 0.001) and adnexal surgery (p < 0.002) was observed. We registered two laparoscopic conversion (3.2%) in the Group A and two (4.3 %) in the Group C. In the Group D, we showed one (2.9%) laparoscopic and two (5.8%) laparotomic conversions. One patient (2.17%) in the Group C was readmitted in the early postoperative period for severe vaginal bleeding.
conclusionsWe report the first series of a novel robotic approach for the treatment of various gynecological conditions. When performed by experienced minimally invasive surgeons, TELELAP ALF-X is feasible and safe. Further studies are mandatory to define the benefits, advantages, and costs of this new robotic approach with respect to others minimally invasive approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.