Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25840777›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2016

Peer Group Similarity in Perceptions of Pubertal Timing.

Natalie Kretsch, Jane Mendle, Jessica Duncan Cance, Kathryn Paige Harden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparing adolescent self staging of pubertal development with hormone biomarkers.Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalie KretschDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop #A8000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. natalie.kretsch@gmail.com.
Jane MendleDepartment of Human Development, Martha van Rensselaer Hall Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jessica Duncan CanceDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station D3700, Bellmont Hall 222, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Kathryn Paige HardenDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop #A8000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

Funding

Wave IV Data CollectionP01HD031921 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 1994 to 2020
$86.1M
Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HAYWARD, MARK D. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Adolescent Health and Academic AchievementR01HD040428 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MULLER, CHANDRA L · 2001 to 2005
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD031921NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD040428NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-report measures of perceived pubertal timing correspond only weakly with clinical measures of "objective" physical development. Peer and school contexts shape adolescents' self-perceptions of pubertal timing. The current study examined associations between perceived pubertal timing and the pubertal timing reported by nominated friends and schoolmates. Participants included 2817 adolescents (Mage = 16.6; 49 % female; 16 % Black; 20 % Hispanic) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Three measures of pubertal timing were included: age-standardized ratings of body changes, comparisons of development relative to peers (relative timing), and, in females, age at menarche. It was hypothesized that relative timing, which explicitly asks adolescents to compare themselves to their peers, would be related to the age-standardized pubertal timing of nominated friends and schoolmates. Surprisingly, there were no associations between relative timing and age-standardized pubertal timing reported by peers, suggesting that pubertal self-perceptions do not fluctuate in response to the average level of development in a friend group. Instead, males were similar to nominated friends and schoolmates in age-standardized ratings of body changes, and females were similar to nominated friends in relative timing, controlling for race, ethnicity, and age. Different self-report measures of pubertal timing index different underlying constructs, and the social processes that influence adolescents' perceptions of pubertal maturation may differ between genders.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAdolescentAge FactorsBody ImageCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFriendsHumansMaleNational Longitudinal Study of Adolescent HealthPubertySelf ReportTime FactorsMeasurementPeersPubertal timingPuberty

Identifiers

PMID25840777
PMCPMC4848160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.