Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25840651›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2015

The evolution of face processing networks.

Kevin S Weiner, Kalanit Grill-Spector

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mapping macaque to human cortex with natural scene responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The neurobiology of vocal communication in marmosets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Face-Selective Patches in Marmosets Are Involved in Dynamic and Static Facial Expression Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Encoding of dynamic facial information in the middle dorsal face area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Interspecies activation correlations reveal functional correspondences between marmoset and human brain areas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin S WeinerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: kweiner@stanford.edu.
Kalanit Grill-SpectorDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Functional-neuroanatomy of high-level visual cortex: a quantitative multimodal approachR01EY023915 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kalanit Grill-Spector · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS 1 R01 EY 02391501A1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies in marmosets, macaques, and humans have begun to show commonalities and differences in the evolution of face processing networks. Despite differences in brain size and gyrification across species, myelination and motion may be key anatomical and functional features contributing to the surprising similarity of face networks across species.

Indexed as

AnimalsMaleVisual CortexVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID25840651
PMCPMC4414913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.