ArticleHealth services research1989
The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis.
Article in Health services research, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring disparities: a regional analysis of harm reduction supply distribution and opioid-related deaths across Ontario's Public Health Units.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Measuring the level of compulsory hospitalisation in mental health care: The performance of different measures across areas and over time.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2021Article
- The Effect of Geographic Units of Analysis on Measuring Geographic Variation in Medical Services Utilization.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2016Article
- Is there much variation in variation? Revisiting statistics of small area variation in health services research.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- Regional variations in the use of home care services in Ontario, 1993/95.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 1999Article
- Distribution of physicians in Ontario. Where are there too few or too many family physicians and general practitioners?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1997Article
- [Regional variations in health services: various methodological problems].Sozial- und Praventivmedizin · 1996Article
- Analysis of variations in mortality rates with small numbers.Health services research · 1994Article
- Testing the null hypothesis in small area analysis.Health services research · 1992Article
- What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis.Health services research · 1990Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews the current small-area variation analysis (SAVA) approach to population-based rates of surgery, and describes a new method for ascertaining variance based on the beta-binomial probability distribution of small-area rates. The critical review of the current SAVA approach focuses (1) on how incidence rates are calculated, and (2) on how the significance of the observed magnitude between the largest and smallest rates (i.e., the external quotient) is ascertained. While reducing the problems of calculating rates by considering only certain operative procedures, the new method addresses the current inadequacies of ascertaining significant differences among small areas. Not only does it correctly assess likelihood of an extermal quotient, it also can determine the particular area's rate, producing an unlikely extermal quotient. The method evaluates the probability that the observed magnitude of the extremal quotient is due solely to chance and study design effects, and tables of these probabilities are available for the method's application. A mathematical model, based on a combination of the binomial and beta distributions, uses (1) the sample size, (2) the average of the areas' rates, (3) the variance among the rates, and (4) a specific quotient level to determine the probability of observing the quotient by chance. After computerizing this calculation, probability tables for reasonable values of these four parameters are generated. In addition to looking at just one quotient for each sample, the probability tables facilitate the easy examination of intermediate quotients when the extremal quotient is unlikely due to chance. By alternatively ignoring the highest and lowest rates, two new quotients can be produced and tested. Given that one of these two quotients is likely due to chance, the excluded rate (i.e., producing the unlikely extremal quotient) can be classified as an outliner, and the associated small area should be the focus of more detailed investigation. The probability tables reveal that the external quotient is not the appropriate statistic to be applied in studies where many small areas are to be included. The probability of seeing even a "large" extremal quotient simply by chance rapidly approaches one as the sample size increases. However, an extremal quotient modeled from a beta-binomial distribution can be useful for studies with small sample sizes (e.g., six counties). The use of this beta-binomial model for small-area rates provides a new method of designing and evaluating small-area studies where costs or domain limit the number of areas under consideration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
2584039PMC1065591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.