Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25840101›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2015

Advanced imaging tools rather than hemodynamics should be the primary approach for diagnosing, following, and managing pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Mario Gerges, Christian Gerges, Irene M Lang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of imaging in pulmonary hypertension.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021
    Review
  3. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - still evolving.Global cardiology science & practice · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Advanced imaging in pulmonary hypertension: emerging techniques and applications.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging the heart in pulmonary hypertension: an update.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mario GergesDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian GergesDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Irene M LangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: irene.lang@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is currently defined based on invasive measurements: a resting pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg. For pulmonary arterial hypertension, a pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤ 15 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance > 3 Wood units are also required. Thus, right heart catheterization is inevitable at present. However, the diagnosis, follow-up, and management of PH by noninvasive techniques is progressing. Significant advances have been achieved in the imaging of pulmonary vascular disease and the right ventricle. We review the current sensitivities and specificities of noninvasive imaging of PH and discuss its role and future potential to replace hemodynamics as the primary approach to screening, diagnosing, and following/managing PH.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularDisease ManagementDiagnostic ImagingHemodynamicsHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID25840101
PMCPMC4397191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.