Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25840008›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2015

Neurodegenerative diseases: expanding the prion concept.

Lary C Walker, Mathias Jucker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 353 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Digital seed amplification assay for TDP-43 aggregate quantification in CSF.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Digital seed amplification assay for TDP-43 aggregate quantification in CSF.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lary C WalkerYerkes National Primate Research Center and.
Mathias Jucker
Emory National Primate Research CenterGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
YNPRC NHP CLINICAL MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM - SUPPLEMENTP51RR000165 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, JOHN DAVID · 1985 to 2011
$114.0M
The Emory Alzheimer's Disease CenterP50AG025688 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVEY, ALLAN I · 2005 to 2019
$25.7M
Cellular trafficking of pathogenic Abeta seeds in vitro and in vivoR21AG040589 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BETARBET, RANJITA S, WALKER, LARY C · 2011 to 2012
$397k
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000165NCRR NIH HHS RR000165NIA NIH HHS AG025688NIA NIH HHS AG040589NIA NIH HHS P50 AG025688NIA NIH HHS R21 AG040589NIH HHS OD11132NIH HHS P51 OD011132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prion paradigm has emerged as a unifying molecular principle for the pathogenesis of many age-related neurodegenerative diseases. This paradigm holds that a fundamental cause of specific disorders is the misfolding and seeded aggregation of certain proteins. The concept arose from the discovery that devastating brain diseases called spongiform encephalopathies are transmissible to new hosts by agents consisting solely of a misfolded protein, now known as the prion protein. Accordingly, "prion" was defined as a "proteinaceous infectious particle." As the concept has expanded to include other diseases, many of which are not infectious by any conventional definition, the designation of prions as infectious agents has become problematic. We propose to define prions as "proteinaceous nucleating particles" to highlight the molecular action of the agents, lessen unwarranted apprehension about the transmissibility of noninfectious proteopathies, and promote the wider acceptance of this revolutionary paradigm by the biomedical community.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesPrionsPrionsAlzheimer's diseaseamyloidcell-to-cell spreadingdisease progressionParkinson's diseaseprionproteopathysynucleintautransmission

Identifiers

PMID25840008
PMCPMC4803040
OpenAlexW2156606243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.