Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25839002›Full record

ArticleNorth American journal of medical sciences2015

Factors associated with the uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in portland, Jamaica.

Butho Ncube, Amita Bey, Jeremy Knight, Patricia Bessler, Pauline E Jolly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American journal of medical sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cervical Cancer Screening Among Older Garifuna Women Residing in New York City.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Moroccan Women's Attitudes Regarding Pap Smear Test and Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Butho NcubeDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Amita BeyDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Jeremy KnightNorth East Regional Health Authority, Jamaica.
Patricia BesslerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Pauline E JollyDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCornwall Regional Hospital · JM

Funding

UAB Public Health/Biomedical Research Training ProgramT37MD001448 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JOLLY, PAULINE EVADNE · 2005 to 2024
$4.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS T37 MD001448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide and is the leading cause of deaths in developing countries. Despite the strong evidence that cervical cancer screening results in decreased mortality from this disease, the uptake for cervical screening among Jamaican women remains low.

aimsThis study was carried out to identify factors associated with Jamaican women's decisions to screen for cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsCross-sectional descriptive study of 403 women aged 19 years and older from Portland, Jamaica. An interviewer-administered questionnaire assessed the women's cervical cancer screening history, as well as their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the disease and screening.

resultsOf the 403 women interviewed, 66% had a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and only 16% had a Pap test within the past year. Significant predicators of uptake of screening were being married, age, parity, discussing cancer with health provider, perception of consequences of not having a Pap smear, and knowing a person with cervical cancer. Women who did not know where to go for a Pap smear were 85% less likely to have been screened (prevalence odds ratio (POR): 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04, 0.52).

conclusionsThis study showed suboptimal uptake of cervical cancer screening among Jamaican women. Multipronged approaches are needed to address barriers to screening, as well as identify and support conditions that encourage women's use of reproductive health services, thereby reducing incidence and mortality rates from cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCervical screeningsHealth systemsJamaicaPap smears

Identifiers

PMID25839002
PMCPMC4382764
OpenAlexW1969295562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.