ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2015
Default settings of computerized physician order entry system order sets drive ordering habits.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of non-interruptive nudge interventions in electronic health records to improve the delivery of care in hospitals: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of clinical pathology · 2018Pooled it
- Electronic health record intervention to increase use of NSAIDs as analgesia for hospitalised patients: a cluster randomised controlled study.BMJ health & care informatics · 2023Trial
- A behavioral intervention to promote use of multimodal pain medication for hospitalized patients: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of hospital medicine · 2023Trial
- Architecting Process of Care: A randomized controlled study evaluating the impact of providing nonadherence information and pharmacist assistance to physicians.Health services research · 2020Trial
- Using human factors methods to mitigate bias in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Nudging towards Sleep-Friendly Health Care: A Multifaceted Approach on Reducing Unnecessary Overnight Interventions.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- The Application of Dental Fluoride Varnish in Children: A Low Cost, High-Value Implementation Aided by Passive Clinical Decision Support.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Reducing day 3 baseline monitoring bloodwork and ultrasound for patients undergoing timed intercourse and intrauterine insemination treatment cycles.Fertility research and practice · 2021Article
- Clinical informatics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned and implications for emergency department and inpatient operations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- How Should Clinicians' Performance Be Assessed When Health Care Organizations Implement Behavioral Architecture That Generates Negative Consequences?AMA journal of ethics · 2020Article
- Web Exclusive. Annals for Hospitalists Inpatient Notes - Realizing the Promises of Hospital Electronic Order Sets.Annals of internal medicine · 2020Article
- The Impact of Changes to an Electronic Admission Order Set on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Effect of default order set settings on telemetry ordering.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Ordering Patterns and Costs of Specialized Laboratory Testing by Hospitalists and House Staff in Hospitalized Patients With HIV at a County Hospital: An Opportunity for Diagnostic Stewardship.Open forum infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Implementation of a new health information technology for the management of cancer chemotherapies.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018Article
- Impact of order set design on urine culturing practices at an academic medical centre emergency department.BMJ quality & safety · 2018Article
- Creation and Use of an Electronic Health Record Reporting Database to Improve a Laboratory Test Utilization Program.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
- Some current dimensions of the behavioral economics of health-related behavior change.Preventive medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are quickly becoming ubiquitous, and groups of orders ("order sets") to allow for easy order input are a common feature. This provides a streamlined mechanism to view, modify, and place groups of related orders. This often serves as an electronic equivalent of a specialty requisition. A characteristic, of these order sets is that specific orders can be predetermined to be "preselected" or "defaulted-on" whenever the order set is used while others are "optional" or "defaulted-off" (though there is typically the option is to "deselect" defaulted-on tests in a given situation). While it seems intuitive that the defaults in an order set are often accepted, additional study is required to understand the impact of these "default" settings in an order set on ordering habits. This study set out to quantify the effect of changing the default settings of an order set.
methodsFor quality improvement purposes, order sets dealing with transfusions were recently reviewed and modified to improve monitoring of outcome. Initially, the order for posttransfusion hematocrits and platelet count had the default setting changed from "optional" to "preselected." The default settings for platelet count was later changed back to "optional," allowing for a natural experiment to study the effect of the default selections of an order set on clinician ordering habits.
resultsPosttransfusion hematocrit values were ordered for 8.3% of red cell transfusions when the default order set selection was "off" and for 57.4% of transfusions when the default selection was "preselected" (P < 0.0001). Posttransfusion platelet counts were ordered for 7.0% of platelet transfusions when the initial default order set selection was "optional," increased to 59.4% when the default was changed to "preselected" (P < 0.0001), and then decreased to 7.5% when the default selection was returned to "optional." The posttransfusion platelet count rates during the two "optional" periods: 7.0% versus 7.5% - were not statistically different (P = 0.620). DISCUSSION: Default settings in CPOE order sets can significantly influence physician selection of laboratory tests. Careful consideration by all stakeholders, including clinicians and pathologists, should be obtained when establishing default settings in order sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.