Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25838890›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2015

Pig feeds rich in rapeseed products and organic selenium increased omega-3 fatty acids and selenium in pork meat and backfat.

Eli Gjerlaug-Enger, Anna Haug, Mari Gaarder, Kari Ljøkjel, Ragna Sveipe Stenseth, Kerstin Sigfridson, Bjørg Egelandsdal, Kristin Saarem, Per Berg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New horizons for selenium in animal nutrition and functional foods.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioactive Compounds in Functional Meat Products.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Eli Gjerlaug-EngerNorsvin Furnesveien 223, 2319, Hamar, Norway.
Anna HaugDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences 1432, Ås, Norway.
Mari GaarderNortura SA Postboks 360 Økern, 0513, Oslo, Norway.
Kari LjøkjelFelleskjøpet Fôrutvikling Nedre Ila 20, 7018, Trondheim, Norway.
Ragna Sveipe StensethFelleskjøpet Agri Stange Silovegen 6, 2335, Stange, Norway.
Kerstin SigfridsonLantmännen Cerealia Nesttunveien 90, 5221, Nesttun, Sweden.
Bjørg EgelandsdalDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences 1432, Ås, Norway.
Kristin SaaremNortura SA Postboks 360 Økern, 0513, Oslo, Norway.
Per BergNortura SA Postboks 360 Økern, 0513, Oslo, Norway.
Nortura (Norway) · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOFelleskjøpet Agri (Norway) · NOFelleskjøpet (Norway) · NOLantmännen · SENorsvin (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concentration of omega-3 fatty acids and selenium (Se) is generally too low in the Western diet. But as the nutrient composition of pork meat and adipose tissue is influenced by the feed given to the animals, the product can be changed to support nutrient demands. Half (297/594) the pigs were given a feed concentrate based on low-glucosinolate rapeseed products (RS), while the other half was fed a traditional concentrate (Contr): The RS feed had an omega-6/omega-3 ratio of 3.6:1, and the Contr feed had a ratio of 8.9:1, and both feeds were supplemented with 0.4 mg Se/kg (organic Se: inorganic Se, 1:1). There was a small difference in growth rate, but no differences in feed conversion ratio, lean meat percentage, carcass value, and margin per pig for the two groups. There were no differences in meat quality between the two groups, but there were differences in technological fat quality. The RS pigs contained about 2 times more alpha-linolenic acid in the backfat and 41% more in the meat (M. longissimus dorsi) compared to the controls. The concentration of EPA, DPA, and DHA were 42% and 20% higher in backfat and meat of the RS pigs compared to the control pigs respectively. The ratio between omega-6/omega-3 fatty acids were 4.7 in the meat and 4.0 in the backfat in the RS pigs, and the corresponding values were 6.6 and 8.0 in the control pigs. The selenium content was 0.3 mg/kg meat in both groups. The study showed that a portion of the present pig meat (175 g) provided the daily recommended intake of Se for men and women and about 1/6 of proposed reference intake of omega-3 LCPUFA (250 mg/day) to reduce the risk of CVD thereby providing a meat that is somewhat healthier for the consumer.

Indexed as

Meatmeat and fat qualityomega-3 and omega-6 fatty acidspigseleniumslaughter pig efficiency

Identifiers

PMID25838890
PMCPMC4376406
OpenAlexW1979367891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.