Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25838824›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of analytical chemistry2015

Recent developments in sweat analysis and its applications.

Saima Jadoon, Sabiha Karim, Muhammad Rouf Akram, Abida Kalsoom Khan, Muhammad Abid Zia, Abdul Rauf Siddiqi, Ghulam Murtaza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saima JadoonDepartment of Natural Resources Engineering and Management, University of Kurdistan, Hewler 44003, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-5509-9728
Sabiha KarimUniversity College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rouf AkramDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Abida Kalsoom KhanDepartment of Chemistry, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.
Muhammad Abid ZiaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Education, Attock Campus, Attock 43600, Pakistan.
Abdul Rauf SiddiqiDepartment of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
Ghulam MurtazaDepartment of Pharmacy, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5649-5768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the clinical use of sweat as biofluid is limited. The collection of sweat and its analysis for determining ethanol, drugs, ions, and metals have been encompassed in this review article to assess the merits of sweat compared to other biofluids, for example, blood or urine. Moreover, sweat comprises various biomarkers of different diseases including cystic fibrosis and diabetes. Additionally, the normalization of sampled volume of sweat is also necessary for getting efficient and useful results.

Identifiers

PMID25838824
PMCPMC4369929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.