SynthesisBMJ open2015
Risk factors for emergency presentation with lung and colorectal cancers: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Gender-specific differences in care-seeking behaviour among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability ofBMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Emergency diagnosis of multiple myeloma: a SEER-Medicare study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Local and National Trends in Emergency Presentation of Colon and Rectal Cancer.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Cancer Incidence and Survival after Emergency Department Care in the U.S. Midwest: An Opportunity for Cancer Interception.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Improving Cancer Diagnosis in Alberta, Canada: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Department Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosing Cancer in the Emergency Setting.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Improving colorectal cancer in Alberta, Canada: a qualitative study of patients and close contacts' perceptions on diagnosis following an emergency department presentation.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Emergency Department Visits Before Cancer Diagnosis Among Women at Mayo Clinic.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024Article
- National analysis of racial disparities in emergent surgery for colorectal cancer.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic versus Open Emergency Surgery for Right Colon Cancers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Variations in the Type of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among Stage III Colon Cancer Patients in England.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Article
- Mortality Risk Stratification in Emergency Surgery for Obstructive Colon Cancer-External Validation of International Scores, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC), and the Dedicated Score of French Surgical Association (AFC/OCC Score).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- CDK1 and HSP90AA1 Appear as the Novel Regulatory Genes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bioinformatics Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Do presenting symptoms, use of pre-diagnostic endoscopy and risk of emergency cancer diagnosis vary by comorbidity burden and type in patients with colorectal cancer?British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Socio-Economic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Cancers · 2022Review
- Colonic Stenting in the Emergency Setting.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Sensations, symptoms, and then what? Early bodily experiences prior to diagnosis of lung cancer.PloS one · 2021Article
- Diagnosis Setting and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: The Impact of Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department.The Journal of surgical research · 2020Article
- Predictors of an early death in patients diagnosed with colon cancer: a retrospective case-control study in the UK.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Contrasting effects of comorbidities on emergency colon cancer diagnosis: a longitudinal data-linkage study in England.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify patient and practitioner factors that influence cancer diagnosis via emergency presentation (EP).
designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EBM Reviews, Science and Social Sciences Citation Indexes, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science and Humanities. Searches were undertaken from 1996 to 2014. No language restrictions were applied. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of any design assessing factors associated with diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer via EP, or describing an intervention to impact on EP, were included. Studies involving previously diagnosed cancer patients, assessing only referral pathway effectiveness, outcomes related to diagnosis or post-EP management were excluded. The population was individual or groups of adult patients or primary care practitioners. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion.
results22 studies with over 200,000 EPs were included, most providing strong evidence. Five were graded 'insufficient', primarily due to missing information rather than methodological weakness. Older patient age was associated with EP for lung and colorectal cancers (OR 1.11-11.03 and 1.19-5.85, respectively). Women were more at risk of EP for lung but not colorectal cancer. Higher deprivation increased the likelihood of lung cancer EP, but evidence for colorectal was less conclusive. Being unmarried (or divorced/widowed) increased the likelihood of EP for colorectal cancer, which was also associated with pain, obstruction and weight loss. Lack of a regular source of primary care, and lower primary care use were positively associated with EP. Only three studies considered practitioner factors, two involving diagnostic tests. No conclusive evidence was found.
conclusionsPatient-related factors, such as age, gender and deprivation, increase the likelihood of cancer being diagnosed as the result of an EP, while cancer symptoms and patterns of healthcare utilisation are also relevant. Further work is needed to understand the context in which risk factors for EP exist and influence help-seeking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.