Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25838505›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Impact of cardiovascular risk factors and medication use on the efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning: post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Astrid Drivsholm Sloth, Michael Rahbek Schmidt, Kim Munk, Morten Schmidt, Lars Pedersen, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Hans Erik Bøtker, CONDI Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00435266 (The Effect of Remote Preconditioning in Primary Percutaneous Intervention of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00435266 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

The Effect of Remote Preconditioning in Primary Percutaneous Intervention of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2007 to 2009Enrolled250ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsRemote ischemic preconditioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Perioperative Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Astrid Drivsholm SlothDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Michael Rahbek SchmidtDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Kim MunkDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Morten SchmidtDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Lars PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Henrik Toft SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Hans Erik BøtkerDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
CONDI Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRemote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) promotes cardioprotection in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The effect of RIC may be modified by cardiovascular risk factors and their medications. We examined whether cardiovascular risk factors, lipid and glucose levels, and medication use influenced the efficacy of RIC in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI.

designPost hoc subgroup analysis of a single-centre randomised controlled trial.

participantsA total of 139 patients with STEMI, randomised during ambulance transport to hospital for pPCI with (n=71) or without (n=68) RIC, met the trial criteria and achieved data for a myocardial salvage index (MSI).

interventionsRIC was administered through intermittent arm ischaemia with four cycles of 5 min inflation and 5 min deflation of a blood pressure cuff. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: MSI, estimated by single-photon emission CT. We evaluated the efficacy of RIC on the MSI in patient subgroups of cardiovascular risk factors, lipid and glucose levels, and medication use.

resultsWe found no significant difference in the efficacy of RIC in subgroups of cardiovascular risk factors, lipid and glucose levels, and medication use. However, point estimates indicated a reduced effect of RIC among smokers (median difference in MSI between RIC and control groups: -0.02 (95% CI -0.32 to 0.28) in smokers vs 0.25 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.42) in non-smokers, p value for interaction=0.13) and an increased effect of RIC in statin users (median difference in MSI between RIC and control groups: 0.34 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.65) in statin users vs 0.09 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.29) in non-statin users, p value for interaction=0.19).

conclusionsRIC as an adjunct to pPCI seems to improve MSI in our trial population of patients with STEMI regardless of most cardiovascular risk factors and their medications. Our post hoc finding on a limited sample size calls for further investigation in large-scale multicentre trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00435266.

Indexed as

IschemiaMyocardiumPercutaneous Coronary InterventionSmokingAgedArmBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialLipidsMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipids

Identifiers

PMID25838505
PMCPMC4390720

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.