SynthesisBMJ open2015
Do cognitive interventions improve general cognition in dementia? A meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03577717 (Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training in the Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training in the Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Outcomes and Magnetoencephalographic Imaging
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of cognitive interventions for adult surgical patients after general anaesthesia to improve cognitive functioning: A systematic review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of computer-based interventions for community-dwelling people with cognitive decline: a systematic review with meta-analyses.BMC geriatrics · 2023Pooled it
- The Effect of Cognitive Intervention on Cognitive Function in Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions on cognition in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ageing research reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Brain Gaming in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021Pooled it
- Physical exercise improves quality of life, depressive symptoms, and cognition across chronic brain disorders: a transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Souvenaid for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020Guideline
- Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews.Neuropsychology review · 2020Pooled it
- A mixed methods systematic review of multimodal non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition for people with dementia.Dementia (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Overview of Meta-Analyses of Five Non-pharmacological Interventions for Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of computerised cognitive training on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review.Neuropsychology review · 2019Pooled it
- Art therapy for people with dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- The treatment of cognitive dysfunction in dementia: a multiple treatments meta-analysis.Psychopharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Recommendations on screening for cognitive impairment in older adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016Guideline
- Effectiveness of a 52-week multidomain intervention to maintain cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effect of combined and intensive rehabilitation on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease evaluated through a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo review the efficacy of cognitive interventions on improving general cognition in dementia.
methodOnline literature databases and trial registers, previous systematic reviews and leading journals were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials. A systematic review, random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted. Cognitive interventions were categorised as: cognitive stimulation (CS), involving a range of social and cognitive activities to stimulate multiple cognitive domains; cognitive training (CT), involving repeated practice of standardised tasks targeting a specific cognitive function; cognitive rehabilitation (CR), which takes a person-centred approach to target impaired function; or mixed CT and stimulation (MCTS). Separate analyses were conducted for general cognitive outcome measures and for studies using 'active' (designed to control for non-specific therapeutic effects) and non-active (minimal or no intervention) control groups.
results33 studies were included. Significant positive effect sizes (Hedges’ g) were found for CS with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) (g=0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.66; p<0.001) compared to non-active controls and (g=0.35, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.64; p=0.019) compared to active controls. Significant benefit was also seen with the Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (g=-0.26, 95% CI -0.445 to -0.08; p=0.005). There was no evidence that CT or MCTS produced significant improvements on general cognition outcomes and not enough CR studies for meta-analysis. The lowest accepted minimum clinically important difference was reached in 11/17 CS studies for the MMSE, but only 2/9 studies for the ADAS-Cog. Additionally, 95% prediction intervals suggested that although statistically significant, CS may not lead to benefits on the ADAS-Cog in all clinical settings.
conclusionsCS improves scores on MMSE and ADAS-Cog in dementia, but benefits on the ADAS-Cog are generally not clinically significant and difficulties with blinding of patients and use of adequate placebo controls make comparison with the results of dementia drug treatments problematic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.