Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25838501›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

Do cognitive interventions improve general cognition in dementia? A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

J D Huntley, R L Gould, K Liu, M Smith, R J Howard

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03577717 (Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training in the Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03577717 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training in the Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Outcomes and Magnetoencephalographic Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei Hospital, TaiwanRan2018 to 2019Enrolled7ConditionsMild Cognitive ImpairmentArmscomputerized cognitive training, occupational therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Souvenaid for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020
    Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Art therapy for people with dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  18. Recommendations on screening for cognitive impairment in older adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Guideline
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J D HuntleyDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
R L GouldDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
K LiuDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
M SmithDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
R J HowardDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the efficacy of cognitive interventions on improving general cognition in dementia.

methodOnline literature databases and trial registers, previous systematic reviews and leading journals were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials. A systematic review, random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted. Cognitive interventions were categorised as: cognitive stimulation (CS), involving a range of social and cognitive activities to stimulate multiple cognitive domains; cognitive training (CT), involving repeated practice of standardised tasks targeting a specific cognitive function; cognitive rehabilitation (CR), which takes a person-centred approach to target impaired function; or mixed  CT and stimulation (MCTS). Separate analyses were conducted for general cognitive outcome measures and for studies using 'active' (designed to control for non-specific therapeutic effects) and non-active (minimal or no intervention) control groups.

results33 studies were included. Significant positive effect sizes (Hedges’ g) were found for CS with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) (g=0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.66; p<0.001) compared to non-active controls and (g=0.35, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.64; p=0.019) compared to active controls. Significant benefit was also seen with the Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (g=-0.26, 95% CI -0.445 to -0.08; p=0.005). There was no evidence that CT or MCTS produced significant improvements on general cognition outcomes and not enough CR studies for meta-analysis. The lowest accepted minimum clinically important difference was reached in 11/17 CS studies for the MMSE, but only 2/9 studies for the ADAS-Cog. Additionally, 95% prediction intervals suggested that although statistically significant, CS may not lead to benefits on the ADAS-Cog in all clinical settings.

conclusionsCS improves scores on MMSE and ADAS-Cog in dementia, but benefits on the ADAS-Cog are generally not clinically significant and difficulties with blinding of patients and use of adequate placebo controls make comparison with the results of dementia drug treatments problematic.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCognition DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyDementiaHumansRegression AnalysisGERIATRIC MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID25838501
PMCPMC4390716
OpenAlexW2057843174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.