Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25838346›Full record

ReviewBlood2015

New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Bruno Paiva, Jacques J M van Dongen, Alberto Orfao

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 150 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05199311 phase1 / phase2suspendednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I/II Study of Carfilzomib, Iberdomide (CC-220) and Dexamethasone (KID) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2022 to 2027Enrolled66ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsCarfilzomib, Iberdomide, Oral Dexamethasone
NCT06109233 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Perspective Study of the MRD-tailored Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Persistent Minimal Residual Disease After Initial Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorFengYan JinRan2022 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsMultiple Myeloma, Minimal Residual Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 291 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno PaivaClinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain;
Jacques J M van DongenDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and.
Alberto OrfaoCancer Research Center Instituto de Biologia Celular y Molecular del Cancer-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas/University of Salamanca, Department of Medicine Cytometry Service, and Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Centro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming standard diagnostic care for potentially curable neoplasms such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In multiple myeloma (MM), the majority of patients will inevitably relapse despite achievement of progressively higher complete remission (CR) rates. Novel treatment protocols with inclusion of antibodies and small molecules might well be able to further increase remission rates and potentially also cure rates. Therefore, MRD diagnostics becomes essential to assess treatment effectiveness. This review summarizes reports from the past 2 decades, which demonstrate that persistent MRD by multiparameter flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography, predicts significantly inferior survival among CR patients. We describe the specific features of currently available techniques for MRD monitoring and outline the arguments favoring new criteria for response assessment that incorporate MRD levels. Extensive data indicate that MRD information can potentially be used as biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies, help on treatment decisions, and act as surrogate for overall survival. The time has come to address within clinical trials the exact role of baseline risk factors and MRD monitoring for tailored therapy in MM, which implies systematic usage of highly sensitive, cost-effective, readily available, and standardized MRD techniques.

Indexed as

HumansMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25838346
PMCPMC4513329
OpenAlexW2025013606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.