Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25838283›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0.

Eörs Szathmáry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reply to Rana and Singh: Critical thresholds and critical actions for evolvable AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolvable AI: Threats of a new major transition in evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Tracing Genetic Images Formed During Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. The selfish ribosome.PLoS biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early transitions in the evolution of cognition.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Bifurcations and phase transitions in the origins of life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Top-Down Coercive Mechanisms and the Major Transitions in Evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  18. The hard steps model and whole Earth-system transitions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eörs SzathmáryCenter for the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Parmenides Foundation, D-82049 Munich, Germany; Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Biological Institute, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary; and MTA-ELTE Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary szathmary.eors@gmail.com.

Funding

European Research Council 294332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impressive body of work on the major evolutionary transitions in the last 20 y calls for a reconstruction of the theory although a 2D account (evolution of informational systems and transitions in individuality) remains. Significant advances include the concept of fraternal and egalitarian transitions (lower-level units like and unlike, respectively). Multilevel selection, first without, then with, the collectives in focus is an important explanatory mechanism. Transitions are decomposed into phases of origin, maintenance, and transformation (i.e., further evolution) of the higher level units, which helps reduce the number of transitions in the revised list by two so that it is less top-heavy. After the transition, units show strong cooperation and very limited realized conflict. The origins of cells, the emergence of the genetic code and translation, the evolution of the eukaryotic cell, multicellularity, and the origin of human groups with language are reconsidered in some detail in the light of new data and considerations. Arguments are given why sex is not in the revised list as a separate transition. Some of the transitions can be recursive (e.g., plastids, multicellularity) or limited (transitions that share the usual features of major transitions without a massive phylogenetic impact, such as the micro- and macronuclei in ciliates). During transitions, new units of reproduction emerge, and establishment of such units requires high fidelity of reproduction (as opposed to mere replication).

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBacteriaCultural CharacteristicsEcosystemEukaryotic CellsFemaleGenetic CodeGene Transfer, HorizontalHumansLanguageMaleMitochondriaOrganelle BiogenesisPhagocytosisPhylogenyaggregative unit formationegalitarian transitionsfraternal transitionsmultilevel selectionrecursive transitions

Identifiers

PMID25838283
PMCPMC4547294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.