ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2015
Impact of prior azacitidine on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of the benefit of hypomethylating agents before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndromes.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2021Pooled it
- No benefit of hypomethylating agents compared to supportive care for higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2018Article
- Bridging-to-transplant with Azacitidine for Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Reduces the Incidence of Acute Graft-Hematology reports · 2017Article
- [Advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To clarify the clinical impact of prior use of azacitidine (AZA) on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 15 MDS patients who were treated with AZA before allo-HSCT (AZA group). We compared the outcomes of these 15 patients with 52 MDS patients who were solely given the best supportive care (BSC) before allo-HSCT (BSC group). Although patients in the AZA group were older with higher International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) scores compared to patients in the BSC group, no significant differences were found between the two groups in overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) or non-relapse mortality. However, in patients with a higher IPSS score (Int-2/High), pre-transplant AZA may provide better OS and DFS and lower CIR. Acute graft-versus-host disease rates were similar between the two groups. These results should be reassuring to patients with high-risk MDS receiving AZA before allo-HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.