Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25837751›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2015

Prospective, randomized comparison of same-day dose of 2 different bowel cleanser for afternoon colonoscopy: picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid versus polyethylene glycol.

Tae-Geun Gweon, Sang Woo Kim, Yong-Sun Noh, Seawon Hwang, Na-Young Kim, Yoonbum Lee, Soon-Wook Lee, Sung Won Lee, Jong Yul Lee, Chul-Hyun Lim and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03965182 (A Head-to-head Comparison Study of Polyethylene Glycol, Polyethylene Glycol Plus Sodium Picosulfate, and Sodium Picosulfate), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03965182 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Head-to-head Comparison Study of Polyethylene Glycol, Polyethylene Glycol Plus Sodium Picosulfate, and Sodium Picosulfate

TypeinterventionalSponsorDalin Tzu Chi General HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled600ConditionsBowel PreparationArmsPEG, PEG plus SPMC, SPMC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. NEW BOWEL PREPARATION TECHNIQUE FOR COLONOSCOPY: CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING AQUANET AND MANNITOL.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2018
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tae-Geun GweonFrom the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine.
Sang Woo Kim
Yong-Sun Noh
Seawon Hwang
Na-Young Kim
Yoonbum Lee
Soon-Wook Lee
Sung Won Lee
Jong Yul Lee
Chul-Hyun Lim
Hyung Hun Kim
Jin Su Kim
Yu Kyung Cho
Jae Myung Park
In Seok Lee
Myung-Gyu Choi
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRCatholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For afternoon colonoscopy, same-day administration of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (PM/Ca) is recommended. However, few studies have evaluated the bowel-cleansing efficacy and safety of this regimen. The aim of this study was to compare the bowel-cleansing efficacy, side effects, and patient's tolerability of a same-day split administration of PM/Ca with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for afternoon colonoscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to a PM/Ca group or a PEG group. The PM/Ca group consumed 1 sachet of PM/Ca at 06:00 and 1 sachet of PM/Ca 4 hours before the colonoscopy. They also took 2 tablets of bisacodyl before sleep on the night before. The PEG group consumed 2 L of PEG at 06:00 and 2 L of PEG 4 hours before the colonoscopy. All subjects were instructed to finish the bowel cleanser or fluid at least 2 hours before colonoscopy. All colonoscopic examinations were performed in the afternoon on the same day. The bowel-cleansing efficacy was scored using 2 scales: the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) and the Aronchick scale. Ease of using the bowel cleanser was rated from 1 (very easy) to 5 (very difficult). Two hundred nine patients underwent colonoscopy. The bowel-cleansing scores by OBPS did not differ between groups (5.0 vs 4.9, P = 0.63). Ease of using the bowel cleanser was superior in the PM/Ca group (P < 0.01). The cleansing efficacy of PM/Ca administered on the day of colonoscopy is comparable to that of PEG. Patients prefer PM/Ca.

Indexed as

AdultBisacodylCatharticsCitratesCitric AcidColonoscopyFemaleHumansMagnesium OxideMaleMiddle AgedOrganometallic CompoundsPicolinesPolyethylene GlycolsProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodBisacodylCatharticsCitratesCitric AcidMagnesium OxideOrganometallic CompoundsPicolinespicosulfate sodiumPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID25837751
PMCPMC4554028
OpenAlexW2066409548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.