Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25837418›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2015

Dissecting protein reaction dynamics in living cells by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

Marco Fritzsche, Guillaume Charras

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multiphoton intravital microscopy of rodents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  12. Actin stabilization in cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Sterile activation of invariant natural killer T cells by ER-stressed antigen-presenting cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco FritzscheThe Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Guillaume CharrasLondon Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
London Centre for Nanotechnology · GBMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins within most macromolecular complexes or organelles continuously turn over. This turnover results from association and dissociation reactions that are mediated by each of the protein's functional domains. Thus, studying organelle or macromolecular formation from the bottom up using theoretical and computational modeling approaches will necessitate the determination of all of these reaction rates in vivo. Yet current methods for examining protein dynamics either necessitate highly specialized equipment or limit themselves to basic measurements. In this protocol, we describe a broadly applicable method based on fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) for determining how many reaction processes participate in the turnover of any given protein of interest, for characterizing their apparent association and dissociation rates, and for determining their relative importance in the turnover of the overall protein population. Experiments were performed in melanoma M2 cells expressing mutant forms of ezrin that provide a link between the plasma membrane and the cortical actin cytoskeleton. We also describe a general strategy for the identification of the protein domains that mediate each of the identified turnover processes. Our protocol uses widely available laser-scanning confocal microscopes, open-source software, graphing software and common molecular biology techniques. The entire FRAP experiment preparation, data acquisition and analysis require 3-4 d.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalibrationCell MembraneFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMelanomaMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySoftwareTumor Cells, CulturedProteins

Identifiers

PMID25837418
OpenAlexW2010309369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.