Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25837283›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Pharmacological Selectivity Within Class I Histone Deacetylases Predicts Effects on Synaptic Function and Memory Rescue.

Gavin Rumbaugh, Stephanie E Daws, Emin D Ozkan, Camilo S Rojas, Christopher R Hubbs, Massimiliano Aceti, Mark Kilgore, Shashi Kudugunti, Sathyanarayanan V Puthanveettil, J David Sweatt and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Phytic acid (InsPNature communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Histone deacetylases and their inhibitors in kidney diseases.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Histone deacetylase-3: Friend and foe of the brain.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gavin RumbaughDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Stephanie E Daws1] Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA [2] Department of Metabolism and Aging, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Emin D OzkanDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Camilo S RojasDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Christopher R HubbsDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Massimiliano AcetiDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Mark KilgoreDepartment of Neurobiology, The Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Shashi KuduguntiThe Repligen Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA.
Sathyanarayanan V PuthanveettilDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
J David SweattDepartment of Neurobiology, The Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
James RuscheThe Repligen Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA.
Courtney A Miller1] Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA [2] Department of Metabolism and Aging, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Scripps Research Institute · USRepligen (United States) · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Intersection of causal neurodevelopmental disorder risk genes, cortical circuit function, and cognitive processing required for behavioral adaptionsR01MH096847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Courtney A Miller, GAVIN R RUMBAUGH · 2012 to 2026
$10.4M
Biochemical Mechanisms of Neural PlasticityR01MH057014 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WINDER, DANNY G. · 1996 to 2019
$9.3M
Regulation of Memory Formation by the GTPase-activating Protein SynGAPR01NS064079 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RUMBAUGH, GAVIN R · 2009 to 2017
$3.9M
Synaptic actin dynamics and the selective vulnerability of drug-associated memoryR01DA034116 · NIDA · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI MILLER, COURTNEY A · 2013 to 2018
$2.8M
Molecular and Behavioral Neurobiology of Transcription Factor TCF4R01MH104158 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NISWENDER, COLLEEN M · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
"A Flexible and Scalable HTS Platform for CNS Probe Discovery"R21NS082640 · NINDS · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI DAVIS, RONALD L, RUMBAUGH, GAVIN R · 2013 to 2014
$502k
A new addiction model: Relapse triggered by cognitive stressR03DA033499 · NIDA · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI MILLER, COURTNEY A · 2012 to 2013
$194k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034116NIDA NIH HHS R01DA034116NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA033499NIDA NIH HHS R03DA033499NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057014NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096847NIMH NIH HHS R01MH096847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104158NIMH NIH HHS R01MH57014NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064079NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS082640NINDS NIH HHS R21NS082640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are promising therapeutic targets for neurological and psychiatric disorders that impact cognitive ability, but the relationship between various HDAC isoforms and cognitive improvement is poorly understood, particularly in mouse models of memory impairment. A goal shared by many is to develop HDAC inhibitors with increased isoform selectivity in order to reduce unwanted side effects, while retaining procognitive effects. However, studies addressing this tack at the molecular, cellular and behavioral level are limited. Therefore, we interrogated the biological effects of class I HDAC inhibitors with varying selectivity and assessed a subset of these compounds for their ability to regulate transcriptional activity, synaptic function and memory. The HDAC-1, -2, and -3 inhibitors, RGFP963 and RGFP968, were most effective at stimulating synaptogenesis, while the selective HDAC3 inhibitor, RGFP966, with known memory enhancing abilities, had minimal impact. Furthermore, RGFP963 increased hippocampal spine density, while HDAC3 inhibition was ineffective. Genome-wide gene expression analysis by RNA sequencing indicated that RGFP963 and RGFP966 induce largely distinct transcriptional profiles in the dorsal hippocampus of mature mice. The results of bioinformatic analyses were consistent with RGFP963 inducing a transcriptional program that enhances synaptic efficacy. Finally, RGFP963, but not RGFP966, rescued memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer's Disease. Together, these studies suggest that the specific memory promoting properties of class I HDAC inhibitors may depend on isoform selectivity and that certain pathological brain states may be more receptive to HDAC inhibitors that improve network function by enhancing synapse efficacy.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCells, CulturedConditioning, PsychologicalDisease Models, AnimalFearGene Expression ProfilingGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansHydroxamic AcidsMemory DisordersMiceAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHydroxamic AcidsPresenilin-1PSEN1 protein, humanSynaptophysintrichostatin A

Identifiers

PMID25837283
PMCPMC4538358
OpenAlexW1975144326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.