Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25836738›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2015

Online matrix removal platform for coupling gel-based separations to whole protein electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Ki Hun Kim, Philip D Compton, John C Tran, Neil L Kelleher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Emergence of mass spectrometry detergents for membrane proteomics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Top-Down Proteomics: Ready for Prime Time?Analytical chemistry · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ki Hun KimDepartments of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences and the Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, 2145 North Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Philip D ComptonDepartments of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences and the Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, 2145 North Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
John C TranDepartments of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences and the Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, 2145 North Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Neil L KelleherDepartments of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences and the Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, 2145 North Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.

Funding

The UIUC Neuroproteomics Center on Cell-Cell SignalingP30DA018310 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Elena V Romanova · 2004 to 2026
$24.9M
Eukaryotic Post-Translational ModificationsR01GM067193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KELLEHER, NEIL L · 2003 to 2015
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018310NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fractionation method called gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis (GELFrEE) has been used to dramatically increase the number of proteins identified in top-down proteomic workflows; however, the technique involves the use of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a surfactant that interferes with electrospray ionization. Therefore, an efficient removal of SDS is absolutely required prior to mass analysis. Traditionally, methanol/chloroform precipitation and spin columns have been used, but they lack reproducibility and are difficult to automate. Therefore, we developed an in-line matrix removal platform to enable the direct analysis of samples containing SDS and salts. Only small molecules like SDS permeate a porous membrane and are removed in a manner similar to cross-flow filtration. With this device, near-complete removal of SDS is accomplished within 5 min and proteins are subsequently mobilized into a mass spectrometer. The new platform was optimized for the analysis of GELFrEE fractions enriched for histones extracted from human HeLa cells. All four core histones and their proteoforms were detected in a single spectrum by high-resolution mass spectrometry. The new method versus protein precipitation/resuspension showed 2- to 10-fold improved signal intensities, offering a clear path forward to improve proteome coverage and the efficiency of top-down proteomics.

Indexed as

CalibrationElectrophoresisHeLa CellsHistonesHumansMembranes, ArtificialPorosityProtein IsoformsReference StandardsSodium Dodecyl SulfateSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationHistonesMembranes, ArtificialProtein IsoformsSodium Dodecyl Sulfatecross-flow filtrationgel-based separationonline matrix removal deviceSDS cleanuptop-down proteomics

Identifiers

PMID25836738
PMCPMC4419745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.