Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25836324›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2015

[Molecular pathology for breast cancer: Importance of the gene expression profile].

C Denkert, B M Pfitzner, B I Heppner, M Dietel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03503799 (Prospective Assessment of Disease Progression in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing EndoPredict® Gene Expression Testing - a Care Research Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03503799 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Assessment of Disease Progression in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing EndoPredict® Gene Expression Testing - a Care Research Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNorth Eastern German Society of Gynaecological OncologyRan2018 to 2032Enrolled1,191ConditionsPrimary Invasive Breast Cancer, Estrogen Receptor Positive Tumor, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative TumorArmsObservation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of the Gene Expression Test ProsignaBreast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C DenkertInstitut für Pathologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte,Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland, carsten.denkert@charite.de.
B M Pfitzner
B I Heppner
M Dietel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression arrays are currently used to guide therapy decisions in breast cancer. The indications for gene expression tests are especially important in the group of hormone receptor negative, HER2 positive tumors to decide whether endocrine therapy alone is sufficient or additional chemotherapy is necessary. In this group of luminal tumors conventional clinicopathological parameters are often not suitable to select patients who would benefit from an endocrine therapy alone. Gene expression tests can provide additional information and, therefore, support decision-making and avoid unnecessary chemotherapy. There are a variety of test systems available which poses the questions of which tests should be selected for which patients and how the test results should be evaluated in a direct comparison. This report provides information about three currently available gene expression tests (i.e. OncotypeDx®, Endopredict® and PAM50/Prosigna®), comments on similarities and differences and discusses the impact on therapy decisions. The focus of this article is on a discussion of clinical studies that have compared the different molecular tests in the same clinical study cohort. These investigations allow a first comparative evaluation of the various assays for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesBreastBreast NeoplasmsClinical Studies as TopicCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.