ReviewJournal of nephrology2015
Calciphylaxis: from the disease to the diseased.
Review in Journal of nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improvement in wound healing, pain, and quality of life after 12 weeks of SNF472 treatment: a phase 2 open-label study of patients with calciphylaxis.Journal of nephrology · 2019Trial
- Clinical characteristics and treatment modalities in uremic and non uremic calciphylaxis - a dermatological single-center experience.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Penile Calciphylaxis: A Successfully Treated Case.Cureus · 2024Article
- Calciphylaxis and its co-occurrence with connective tissue diseases.International wound journal · 2023Review
- Sailing between scylla and charybdis-anticoagulation dilemma in a patient with calciphylaxis and mechanical cardiac valve replacement: a case report and literature review.Renal failure · 2023Review
- Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Calciphylaxis in Chinese Hemodialysis Patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion.Journal of nephrology · 2020Review
- Non-uremic calciphylaxis associated with alcoholic hepatitis: A case report.World journal of hepatology · 2019Article
- A case report of severe calciphylaxis - suggested approach for diagnosis and treatment.BMC nephrology · 2017Article
- Differential diagnosis of suspected deep tissue injury.International wound journal · 2016Article
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Calciphylaxis.The American journal of case reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calciphylaxis, or calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is a vascular ossification-calcification disease involving cutaneous or visceral arterioles, with ischemic damage of the surrounding tissues, usually in the setting of chronic kidney disease. Pathogenesis is still unclear and probably comprises the participation of vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and macrophages surrounded by a uremic and/or pro-calcifying environment. According to the original concept of calcific uremic arteriolopathy coined by Hans Selye, risk factors may be divided into sensitizers and challengers and their knowledge is useful in clinical practice to pre-emptively identify both uremic and non-uremic 'at risk' patients and guide treatment. Systemic calcific uremic arteriolopathy is a rarity. Cutaneous calcific uremic arteriolopathy is more frequent and clinically presents as a first phase of cutaneous hardening and erythema, followed by a second phase of ulcerations and scars; these two phases are probably associated with the initial development of arteriolar lesion and tissue ischemic damage, respectively. Clinical history, physical examination, laboratory analysis, histology and imaging are the main tools to exclude important differential diagnoses and obtain a definitive diagnosis. Treatment is generally unrewarding and consists of rigorous control of comorbid conditions, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic strategies, avoidance of iatrogeny and wound and pain management. Prognosis remains poor in terms of morbidity and mortality. Efforts should be made towards a greater awareness of calcific uremic arteriolopathy, development of better therapies and improvement of clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.