Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25835513›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015

Profiles of influenza A/H1N1 vaccine response using hemagglutination-inhibition titers.

Robert M Jacobson, Diane E Grill, Ann L Oberg, Pritish K Tosh, Inna G Ovsyannikova, Gregory A Poland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 vaccines and beyond.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Influenza A Reinfection in Sequential Human Challenge: Implications for Protective Immunity and "Universal" Vaccine Development.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert M Jacobsona Vaccine Research Group; Mayo Clinic ; Rochester , MN USA.
Diane E Grill
Ann L Oberg
Pritish K Tosh
Inna G Ovsyannikova
Gregory A Poland
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Minnesota Rochester · USGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VNWinnMed · US

Funding

Bioinformatics Approach to Influenza A/H1N1 Vaccine Immune ProfilingU01AI089859 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 2010 to 2015
$33.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI 089859NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI089859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify distinct antibody profiles among adults 50-to-74 years old using influenza A/H1N1 HI titers up to 75 days after vaccination. Healthy subjects 50 to 74 years old received the 2010-2011 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. We measured venous samples from Days 0, 28, and 75 for HI and VNA and B-cell ELISPOTs. Of 106 subjects, HI titers demonstrated a ceiling effect for 11 or 10% for those with a pre-vaccination HI titer of 1:640 where no subject post-vaccination had an increase in titer. Of the remaining 95 subjects, only 37 or 35% overall had at least a 4-fold increase by Day 28. Of these 37, 3 waned at least 4-fold, and 13 others 2-fold. Thus 15% of the subjects showed waning antibody titers by Day 75. More than half failed to respond at all. The profiles populated by these subjects as defined by HI did not vary with age or gender. The VNA results mimicked the HI profiles, but the profiles for B-cell ELISPOT did not. HI titers at Days 0, 28, and 75 populate 4 biologically plausible profiles. Limitations include lack of consensus for operationally defining waning as well as for the apparent ceiling. Furthermore, though well accepted as a marker for vaccine response, assigning thresholds with HI has limitations. However, VNA closely matches HI in populating these profiles. Thus, we hold that these profiles, having face- and content-validity, may provide a basis for understanding variation in genomic and transcriptomic response to influenza vaccination in this age group.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedInfluenza VaccinesagingantibodiesASC, Antibody-Secreting CellsELISPOT, Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpotEt al., Et alia (and others)H1N1 subtypehemagglutination inhibition testshemagglutinin glycoproteinsHI, Hemagglutination-InhibitionIgG, Immunoglobulin Ginfluenza a virusinfluenza vaccinesinfluenza virusIQR, Interquartile RangeMDCK, Madin-Darby Canine KidneyPFU, Plaque-Forming Unitsp, p-valueRBC, Red Blood CellsTCID50, Tissue Culture Infectious Dose 50viralVNA, Virus Neutralization AssayWHO, World Health Organizationμl, Microliters

Identifiers

PMID25835513
PMCPMC4514374
OpenAlexW1605476242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.