Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25834945›Full record

Trial reportGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial.

Christian M Simon, David W Klein, Helen A Schartz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Intersectionality-Informed HIV Cure-Related Research at the End of Life: A Call to Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Replacing Paper Informed Consent with Electronic Informed Consent for Research in Academic Medical Centers: A Scoping Review.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian M SimonProgram in Bioethics and Humanities, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
David W KleinLaw, Health Policy & Disability Center, College of Law, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-2950
Helen A SchartzLaw, Health Policy & Disability Center, College of Law, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

Interactive Multimedia and Biorepository Informed ConsentR21HG006293 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KLEIN, DAVID WASHINGTON, SCHARTZ, HELEN A · 2012 to 2013
$415k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG006293NHGRI NIH HHS R21HG006293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe potential of interactive multimedia to improve biobank informed consent has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to test the separate effectiveness of interactivity and multimedia at improving participant understanding and confidence in understanding of informed consent compared with a standard, face-to-face (F2F) biobank consent process.

methodsA 2 (face-to-face versus multimedia) × 2 (standard versus enhanced interactivity) experimental design was used with 200 patients randomly assigned to receive informed consent. All patients received the same information provided in the biobank's nine-page consent document.

resultsInteractivity (F(1,196) = 7.56, P = 0.007, partial η(2) = 0.037) and media (F(1,196) = 4.27, P = 0.04, partial η(2) = 0.021) independently improved participants' understanding of the biobank consent. Interactivity (F(1,196) = 6.793, P = 0.01, partial η(2) = 0.033), but not media (F(1,196) = 0.455, not significant), resulted in increased participant confidence in their understanding of the biobank's consent materials. Patients took more time to complete the multimedia condition (mean = 18.2 min) than the face-to-face condition (mean = 12.6 min).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that interactivity and multimedia each can be effective at promoting an individual's understanding and confidence in their understanding of a biobank consent, albeit with additional time investment. Researchers should not assume that multimedia is inherently interactive, but rather should separate the two constructs when studying electronic consent.

Indexed as

Consent FormsInformed ConsentMultimediaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological Specimen BanksCommunicationComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleMedical Informatics ApplicationsMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25834945
PMCPMC4592360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.