ArticleJournal of clinical bioinformatics2015
Clinical decision support systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine.
Article in Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Dental Treatment Planning and Diagnostic Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- A Detailed Systematic Review on Retinal Image Segmentation Methods.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of Watson for Oncology in clinical application.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Clinical Oncology Practice.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2019Pooled it
- Utility of a Smartphone-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Pressure Ulcer Management by Physicians: Randomized Crossover Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Development of a Comprehensive Decision Support Tool for Chemotherapy-Cycle Prescribing: Initial Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Evaluating the Impact of the Grading and Assessment of Predictive Tools Framework on Clinicians and Health Care Professionals' Decisions in Selecting Clinical Predictive Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Prediction of individualised 6-month mortality risk in opioid use disorder.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of large language models and retrieval-augmented generation for clinical reasoning in pediatric myopia: a 50-case real-world study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Pediatric Diagnostic Quality Measurement in All United States Hospitals.Annals of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The Potential of Bioinformatics in Revolutionizing Disease Diagnosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing hospital workforce planning, scheduling, and performance evaluation through an AI-driven human resource management system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Decision Support Systems ORADIII and ORAD DDx to Histopathological Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictive value of quantitative CT-derived emphysema heterogeneity for outcomes following bronchoscopic lung volume reduction.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT-5.2 responses to frequently asked questions about benign bone tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Modified EfficientNet-B0 Architecture Optimized with Quantum-Behaved Algorithm for Skin Cancer Lesion Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- GenTIGS: a database empowering research and clinical insights on rare genetic disorders with an Indian perspective.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Design and implementation of mHealth applications for older people with cancer: A scoping review.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Review
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As research laboratories and clinics collaborate to achieve precision medicine, both communities are required to understand mandated electronic health/medical record (EHR/EMR) initiatives that will be fully implemented in all clinics in the United States by 2015. Stakeholders will need to evaluate current record keeping practices and optimize and standardize methodologies to capture nearly all information in digital format. Collaborative efforts from academic and industry sectors are crucial to achieving higher efficacy in patient care while minimizing costs. Currently existing digitized data and information are present in multiple formats and are largely unstructured. In the absence of a universally accepted management system, departments and institutions continue to generate silos of information. As a result, invaluable and newly discovered knowledge is difficult to access. To accelerate biomedical research and reduce healthcare costs, clinical and bioinformatics systems must employ common data elements to create structured annotation forms enabling laboratories and clinics to capture sharable data in real time. Conversion of these datasets to knowable information should be a routine institutionalized process. New scientific knowledge and clinical discoveries can be shared via integrated knowledge environments defined by flexible data models and extensive use of standards, ontologies, vocabularies, and thesauri. In the clinical setting, aggregated knowledge must be displayed in user-friendly formats so that physicians, non-technical laboratory personnel, nurses, data/research coordinators, and end-users can enter data, access information, and understand the output. The effort to connect astronomical numbers of data points, including '-omics'-based molecular data, individual genome sequences, experimental data, patient clinical phenotypes, and follow-up data is a monumental task. Roadblocks to this vision of integration and interoperability include ethical, legal, and logistical concerns. Ensuring data security and protection of patient rights while simultaneously facilitating standardization is paramount to maintaining public support. The capabilities of supercomputing need to be applied strategically. A standardized, methodological implementation must be applied to developed artificial intelligence systems with the ability to integrate data and information into clinically relevant knowledge. Ultimately, the integration of bioinformatics and clinical data in a clinical decision support system promises precision medicine and cost effective and personalized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.