Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25834660›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2015

Kiosk versus in-person screening for alcohol and drug use in the emergency department: patient preferences and disclosure.

Abigail Hankin, Leon Haley, Amy Baugher, Kia Colbert, Debra Houry

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Adolescent Substance Use Screening in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  4. Technological Interventions in the Emergency Departments to Enhance Safety and Care Experiences of Mental and Behavioral Health Patients and Staff.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recruitment and Trial-Finding Apps-Time for Rules of the Road.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019
    Review
  10. Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among First-Year College Students: Results From the WMH-ICS Project.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abigail HankinEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Leon HaleyEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Amy BaugherGrady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kia ColbertEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Debra HouryEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnnually eight million emergency department (ED) visits are attributable to alcohol use. Screening ED patients for at-risk alcohol and substance use is an integral component of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment programs, shown to be effective at reducing substance use. The objective is to evaluate ED patients' acceptance of and willingness to disclose alcohol/substance use via a computer kiosk versus an in-person interview.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, survey-based study. Eligible participants included those who presented to walk-in triage, were English-speaking, ≥18 years, were clinically stable and able to consent. Patients had the opportunity to access the kiosk in the ED waiting room, and were approached for an in-person survey by a research assistant (9am-5pm weekdays). Both surveys used validated assessment tools to assess drug and alcohol use. Disclosure statistics and preferences were calculated using chi-square tests and McNemar's test.

resultsA total of 1,207 patients were screened: 229 in person only, 824 by kiosk, and 154 by both in person and kiosk. Single-modality participants were more likely to disclose hazardous drinking (p=0.003) and high-risk drug use (OR=22.3 [12.3-42.2]; p<0.0001) via kiosk. Participants who had participated in screening via both modalities were more likely to reveal high-risk drug use on the kiosk (p=0.003). When asked about screening preferences, 73.6% reported a preference for an in-person survey, which patients rated higher on privacy and comfort.

conclusionED patients were significantly more likely to disclose at-risk alcohol and substance use to a computer kiosk than an interviewer. Paradoxically patients stated a preference for in-person screening, despite reduced disclosure to a human screener.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAlcoholismBreath TestsCross-Sectional StudiesDisclosureEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleSubstance-Related DisordersTriage

Identifiers

PMID25834660
PMCPMC4380369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.