Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25834595›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2015

Preferred materials and methods employed for endodontic treatment by Iranian general practitioners.

Maryam Raoof, Negar Zeini, Jahangir Haghani, Saeedeh Sadr, Sakineh Mohammadalizadeh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam RaoofDepartment of Endodontics, Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; ; Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; ; Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran;
Negar ZeiniOral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran;
Jahangir HaghaniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran;
Saeedeh SadrEndodontic Department, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran;
Sakineh MohammadalizadehInstructor, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IRHormozgan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to gather information on the materials and methods employed in root canal treatment (RCT) by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Iran. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire was distributed among 450 dentists who attended the 53(th) Iranian Dental Association congress. Participants were asked to consider demographic variables and answer the questions regarding the materials and methods commonly used in RCT. Descriptive statistics were given as absolute frequencies and valid percentages. The chi-square test was used to investigate the influence of gender and the years of professional activity for the employed materials and techniques.

resultsThe response rate was 84.88%. The results showed that 61.5% of the participants did not perform pulp sensitivity tests prior to RCT. Less than half of the general dental practitioners (47.4%) said that they would trace a sinus tract before starting the treatment. Nearly 16% of practitioners preferred the rubber dam isolation method. Over 36% of the practitioners reported using formocresol for pulpotomy. The combined approach of working length (WL) radiographs and electronic apex locators was used by 35.2% of the practitioners. Most of the respondents used K-file hand instruments for canal preparation and the technique of choice was step-back (43.5%), while 40.1% of respondents used NiTi rotary files, mostly ProTaper and RaCe. The most widely used irrigant was normal saline (61.8%). Calcium hydroxide was the most commonly used inter appointment medicament (84.6%). The most popular obturation technique was cold lateral condensation (81.7%) with 51% using zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealers.

conclusionsThe majority of Iranian GDPs who participated in the present survey do not comply with quality guidelines of endodontic treatment.

Indexed as

Apex LocatorDentistsEndodontic TreatmentIranObturationRoot Canal Therapy

Identifiers

PMID25834595
PMCPMC4372785
OpenAlexW2194997759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.