Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25834422›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents.

Joan Estelrich, María Jesús Sánchez-Martín, Maria Antònia Busquets

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 619 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contrast Agents for Enhanced Bioimaging: A Comprehensive Review.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Carbon Dots Meet MRI: Metal Doping for a Smart Contrast Agent Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Probes.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Unveiling Dipolar Interaction-Driven Magnetic Field Inhomogeneities in TAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. GdACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joan EstelrichDepartament de Fisicoquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain ; Institut de Nanociència I Nanotecnologia (IN UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
María Jesús Sánchez-MartínDepartament de Fisicoquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Maria Antònia BusquetsDepartament de Fisicoquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain ; Institut de Nanociència I Nanotecnologia (IN UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESInstitut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia de la Universitat de Barcelona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most widely used and powerful tools for noninvasive clinical diagnosis owing to its high degree of soft tissue contrast, spatial resolution, and depth of penetration. MRI signal intensity is related to the relaxation times (T 1, spin-lattice relaxation and T 2, spin-spin relaxation) of in vivo water protons. To increase contrast, various inorganic nanoparticles and complexes (the so-called contrast agents) are administered prior to the scanning. Shortening T 1 and T 2 increases the corresponding relaxation rates, 1/T 1 and 1/T 2, producing hyperintense and hypointense signals respectively in shorter times. Moreover, the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved with the acquisition of a large number of measurements. The contrast agents used are generally based on either iron oxide nanoparticles or ferrites, providing negative contrast in T 2-weighted images; or complexes of lanthanide metals (mostly containing gadolinium ions), providing positive contrast in T 1-weighted images. Recently, lanthanide complexes have been immobilized in nanostructured materials in order to develop a new class of contrast agents with functions including blood-pool and organ (or tumor) targeting. Meanwhile, to overcome the limitations of individual imaging modalities, multimodal imaging techniques have been developed. An important challenge is to design all-in-one contrast agents that can be detected by multimodal techniques. Magnetoliposomes are efficient multimodal contrast agents. They can simultaneously bear both kinds of contrast and can, furthermore, incorporate targeting ligands and chains of polyethylene glycol to enhance the accumulation of nanoparticles at the site of interest and the bioavailability, respectively. Here, we review the most important characteristics of the nanoparticles or complexes used as MRI contrast agents.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaNanoparticlesFerric CompoundsGadoliniumHumansLanthanoid Series ElementsLiposomesMagnetic Resonance ImagingPolymersSignal-To-Noise RatioStructure-Activity RelationshipContrast MediaFerric CompoundsferriteGadoliniumLanthanoid Series ElementsLiposomesPolymersgadoliniumiron oxide nanoparticlesmagnetoliposomesparamagnetic nanoparticlesrelaxivitysuperparamagnetic nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID25834422
PMCPMC4358688
OpenAlexW2043768129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.