Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25834416›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015

Comorbidities of patients in tiotropium clinical trials: comparison with observational studies of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Marc Miravitlles, David Price, Klaus F Rabe, Hendrik Schmidt, Norbert Metzdorf, Bartolome Celli

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-term safety of tiotropium/olodaterol RespimatInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Inhaled therapies in patients with moderate COPD in clinical practice: current thinking.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Response to Wise et al. (Tiotropium safety in real life populations).British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain.
David PriceAcademic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Klaus F RabeDepartment of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU), Großhansdorf, Germany ; LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Großhansdorf, Germany.
Hendrik SchmidtGlobal Biometrics and Clinical Applications, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Norbert MetzdorfTA Respiratory Diseases, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Bartolome CelliPulmonary Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an ongoing debate on whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seen in real-life clinical settings are represented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of COPD. It is thought that the stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria of RCTs may prevent the participation of patients with specific characteristics or risk factors.

methodsWe surveyed a database of patients recruited into 35 placebo-controlled tiotropium RCTs and also conducted a systematic literature review of large-scale observational studies conducted in patients with a documented diagnosis of COPD between 1990 and 2013. Patient demographics and comorbidities with a high prevalence in patients with COPD were compared between the two patient populations at baseline. Using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; v 14.0), patient comorbidities in the pooled tiotropium RCTs were classified according to system organ class, pharmacovigilance (PV) endpoints, and Standardised MedDRA Queries to enable comparison with the observational studies.

resultsWe identified 24,555 patients in the pooled tiotropium RCTs and 61,361 patients among the 13 observational studies that met our search criteria. The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) staging of patients in the RCTs differed from that in observational studies: the proportion of patients with GOLD stages I+II disease ranged from 40.0% to 51.5% in the RCTs but 24.5% to 44.1% in the observational studies; for GOLD stage III or IV disease these ranges were 7.2%-45.8% (RCTs) and 13.7-42.1% (observational studies). The comorbidities with the highest prevalence reported in the RCTs and observational studies were: hypertension (39.4%-40.0% vs 40.1%-60.6%), other ischemic heart disease (12.3%-14.2% vs 12.5%-41.0%), diabetes (10.3%-10.9% vs 4.0%-38.9%), depression (8.5%-9.5% vs 17.0%-20.6%), and cardiac arrhythmia (7.8%-11.4% vs 11.3%-15.8%).

conclusionThe clinical profile of COPD patients treated in the tiotropium trial program appears to be largely in the range of clinical characteristics, including cardiovascular comorbidities, reported for "real-life patients." The tiotropium RCTs tended to include patients with more severe disease than the observational studies.

Indexed as

Observational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedBronchodilator AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCholinergic AntagonistsComorbidityFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSeverity of Illness IndexTiotropium BromideBronchodilator AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsTiotropium Bromidebaseline characteristicsepidemiologyGOLD stagingpatient populationreal-life patients

Identifiers

PMID25834416
PMCPMC4365745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.