ArticleJournal of neural engineering2015
Compliant intracortical implants reduce strains and strain rates in brain tissue in vivo.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanics of Long-Shank 5 mm Neural Probe Insertion into the Rat Brain: Effects of Geometry and Vibration-Assisted Insertion.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Temporally Delayed Deployment of Photo-Responsive Liquid Crystal Polymer Networks Toward Neural Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial coated intracortical probes reduce invading microbe abundance and subsequent neuroinflammation.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated Cd14 siRNA delivery ameliorates the acute inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode implantation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Mechanical characterization of vertically aligned carbon nanotube forest microelectrodes for neural interfacing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Finite element model predicts micromotion-induced strain profiles that correlate with the functional performance of Utah arrays in humans and non-human primates.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Piezo1 and Piezo2 Ion Channels in Neuronal and Astrocytic Responses to MEA Implants in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Mechanically-adaptive, resveratrol-eluting neural probes for improved intracortical recording performance and stability.Npj flexible electronics · 2025Article
- Electrode Arrays for Detecting and Modulating Deep Brain Neural Information in Primates: A Review.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Review
- Biohybrid neural interfaces: improving the biological integration of neural implants.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- In Vivo Validation of a Mechanically Adaptive Microfluidic Intracortical Device as a Platform for Sustained Local Drug Delivery.Frontiers in biomaterials science · 2023Article
- Differential expression of genes involved in the chronic response to intracortical microelectrodes.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Article
- Deformation and Durability of Soft Three-Dimensional-Printed Polycarbonate Urethane Porous Membranes for Potential Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- Fabrication Methods and Chronic In Vivo Validation of Mechanically Adaptive Microfluidic Intracortical Devices.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Advances in Spinal Cord Stimulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Transparent neural interfaces: challenges and solutions of microengineered multimodal implants designed to measure intact neuronal populations using high-resolution electrophysiology and microscopy simultaneously.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Review
- Advancing the interfacing performances of chronically implantable neural probes in the era of CMOS neuroelectronics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Article
- Insertion mechanics of amorphous SiC ultra-micro scale neural probes.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this research is to characterize the mechanical interactions of (1) soft, compliant and (2) non-compliant implants with the surrounding brain tissue in a rodent brain. Understanding such interactions will enable the engineering of novel materials that will improve stability and reliability of brain implants. APPROACH: Acute force measurements were made using a load cell in n = 3 live rats, each with 4 craniotomies. Using an indentation method, brain tissue was tested for changes in force using established protocols. A total of 4 non-compliant, bare silicon microshanks, 3 non-compliant polyvinyl acetate (PVAc)-coated silicon microshanks, and 6 compliant, nanocomposite microshanks were tested. Stress values were calculated by dividing the force by surface area and strain was estimated using a linear stress-strain relationship. Micromotion effects from breathing and vascular pulsatility on tissue stress were estimated from a 5 s interval of steady-state measurements. Viscoelastic properties were estimated using a second-order Prony series expansion of stress-displacement curves for each shank. MAIN
resultsThe distribution of strain values imposed on brain tissue for both compliant nanocomposite microshanks and PVAc-coated, non-compliant silicon microshanks were significantly lower compared to non-compliant bare silicon shanks. Interestingly, step-indentation experiments also showed that compliant, nanocomposite materials significantly decreased stress relaxation rates in the brain tissue at the interface (p < 0.05) compared to non-compliant silicon and PVAc-coated silicon materials. Furthermore, both PVAc-coated non-compliant silicon and compliant nanocomposite shanks showed significantly reduced (by 4-5 fold) stresses due to tissue micromotion at the interface. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study showed that soft, adaptive materials reduce strains and strain rates and micromotion induced stresses in the surrounding brain tissue. Understanding the material behavior at the site of tissue contact will help to improve neural implant design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.