Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25834044›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Distributed representation of visual objects by single neurons in the human brain.

André B Valdez, Megan H Papesh, David M Treiman, Kris A Smith, Stephen D Goldinger, Peter N Steinmetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Coding of episodic memory in the human hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Computational Neuropsychology and Bayesian Inference.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  6. Precision and False Perceptual Inference.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. Scene-selective coding by single neurons in the human parahippocampal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André B ValdezDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013.
Megan H PapeshDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803.
David M TreimanDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-4097
Kris A SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-6313
Stephen D GoldingerDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85283.
Peter N SteinmetzDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, and PeterNSteinmetz@steinmetz.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5590-7337

Funding

Representation of memory for spoken words and voice detail by single neurons in tR21DC009871 · NIDCD · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI STEINMETZ, PETER N · 2009 to 2010
$414k
NIDCD NIH HHS 1R21DC009871-0NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC009871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains unclear how single neurons in the human brain represent whole-object visual stimuli. While recordings in both human and nonhuman primates have shown distributed representations of objects (many neurons encoding multiple objects), recordings of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe, taken as subjects' discriminated objects during multiple presentations, have shown gnostic representations (single neurons encoding one object). Because some studies suggest that repeated viewing may enhance neural selectivity for objects, we had human subjects discriminate objects in a single, more naturalistic viewing session. We found that, across 432 well isolated neurons recorded in the hippocampus and amygdala, the average fraction of objects encoded was 26%. We also found that more neurons encoded several objects versus only one object in the hippocampus (28 vs 18%, p < 0.001) and in the amygdala (30 vs 19%, p < 0.001). Thus, during realistic viewing experiences, typical neurons in the human medial temporal lobe code for a considerable range of objects, across multiple semantic categories.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultAmygdalaFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adultdistributed representationhuman single neuronmedial temporal lobeobject representation

Identifiers

PMID25834044
PMCPMC4380994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.