Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833953›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2015

Construction of phosphorylation interaction networks by text mining of full-length articles using the eFIP system.

Catalina O Tudor, Karen E Ross, Gang Li, K Vijay-Shanker, Cathy H Wu, Cecilia N Arighi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. iPTMnet RESTful API for Post-translational Modification Network Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  6. RESTful API for iPTMnet: a resource for protein post-translational modification network discovery.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  7. Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protein Bioinformatics Databases and Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. iPTMnet: Integrative Bioinformatics for Studying PTM Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  17. Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions by Evidence Combining Methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catalina O TudorDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Department of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA oanat@udel.edu.
Karen E RossDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Gang LiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
K Vijay-ShankerDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Cathy H WuDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Department of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Cecilia N ArighiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Department of Computer and Information Sciences and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Funding

PRO: A Protein Ontology in Open Biomedical OntologiesR01GM080646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2007 to 2018
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM080646-09NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is a reversible post-translational modification where a protein kinase adds a phosphate group to a protein, potentially regulating its function, localization and/or activity. Phosphorylation can affect protein-protein interactions (PPIs), abolishing interaction with previous binding partners or enabling new interactions. Extracting phosphorylation information coupled with PPI information from the scientific literature will facilitate the creation of phosphorylation interaction networks of kinases, substrates and interacting partners, toward knowledge discovery of functional outcomes of protein phosphorylation. Increasingly, PPI databases are interested in capturing the phosphorylation state of interacting partners. We have previously developed the eFIP (Extracting Functional Impact of Phosphorylation) text mining system, which identifies phosphorylated proteins and phosphorylation-dependent PPIs. In this work, we present several enhancements for the eFIP system: (i) text mining for full-length articles from the PubMed Central open-access collection; (ii) the integration of the RLIMS-P 2.0 system for the extraction of phosphorylation events with kinase, substrate and site information; (iii) the extension of the PPI module with new trigger words/phrases describing interactions and (iv) the addition of the iSimp tool for sentence simplification to aid in the matching of syntactic patterns. We enhance the website functionality to: (i) support searches based on protein roles (kinases, substrates, interacting partners) or using keywords; (ii) link protein entities to their corresponding UniProt identifiers if mapped and (iii) support visual exploration of phosphorylation interaction networks using Cytoscape. The evaluation of eFIP on full-length articles achieved 92.4% precision, 76.5% recall and 83.7% F-measure on 100 article sections. To demonstrate eFIP for knowledge extraction and discovery, we constructed phosphorylation-dependent interaction networks involving 14-3-3 proteins identified from cancer-related versus diabetes-related articles. Comparison of the phosphorylation interaction network of kinases, phosphoproteins and interactants obtained from eFIP searches, along with enrichment analysis of the protein set, revealed several shared interactions, highlighting common pathways discussed in the context of both diseases.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinDiabetes MellitusNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsPhosphoproteinsProtein KinasesData MiningGene Regulatory NetworksHumansPhosphorylationNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25833953
PMCPMC4381107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.