Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833835›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2015

PTEN Expression as a Predictor of Response to Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Uterine Cancer.

Duangmani Thanapprapasr, Rebecca A Previs, Wei Hu, Cristina Ivan, Guillermo N Armaiz-Pena, Piotr L Dorniak, Jean M Hansen, Rajesha Rupaimoole, Jie Huang, Heather J Dalton and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. New Insights on the Nuclear Functions and Targeting of FAK in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Duangmani Thanapprapasr *Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rebecca A Previs *Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Wei HuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cristina IvanCenter for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Guillermo N Armaiz-PenaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Piotr L DorniakDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jean M HansenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rajesha RupaimooleDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jie HuangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Heather J DaltonDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rouba Ali-FehmiDepartment of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Robert L ColemanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Anil K SoodDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BROADDUS, RUSSELL R · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Texas Center for Cancer NanomedicineU54CA151668 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2010 to 2014
$12.4M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
Ovarian Cancer: Mechanisms of Neuroendocrine RegulationR01CA109298 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SOOD, ANIL K · 2005 to 2017
$4.5M
Platelets promote growth of ovarian cancerR01CA177909 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AFSHAR-KHARGHAN, VAHID, SOOD, ANIL K · 2013 to 2023
$4.1M
Novel extra cellular RNA-based combinatorial RNA inhibition therapyUH3TR000943 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CALIN, GEORGE A., LOPEZ-BERESTEIN, GABRIEL · 2015 to 2017
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000943NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS CA 109298NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS P50CA098258NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109298NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177909NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PTEN is known to be frequently mutated in uterine cancer and also dephosphorylates FAK. Here, we examined the impact of PTEN alterations on the response to treatment with a FAK inhibitor (GSK2256098). In vitro and in vivo therapeutic experiments were carried out using PTEN-mutated and PTEN-wild-type models of uterine cancer alone and in combination with chemotherapy. Treatment with GSK2256098 resulted in greater inhibition of pFAK(Y397) in PTEN-mutated (Ishikawa) than in PTEN-wild-type (Hec1A) cells. Ishikawa cells were more sensitive to GSK2256098 than the treated Hec1A cells. Ishikawa cells were transfected with a wild-type PTEN construct and pFAK(Y397) expression was unchanged after treatment with GSK2256098. Decreased cell viability and enhanced sensitivity to chemotherapy (paclitaxel and topotecan) in combination with GSK2256098 was observed in Ishikawa cells as compared with Hec1a cells. In the Ishikawa orthoptopic murine model, treatment with GSK2256098 resulted in lower tumor weights and fewer metastases than mice inoculated with Hec1A cells. Tumors treated with GSK2256098 had lower microvessel density (CD31), less cellular proliferation (Ki67), and higher apoptosis (TUNEL) rates in the Ishikawa model when compared with the Hec1a model. From a large cohort of evaluable patients, increased FAK and pFAK(Y397) expression levels were significantly related to poor overall survival. Moreover, PTEN levels were inversely related to pFAK(Y397) expression. These preclinical data demonstrate that PTEN-mutated uterine cancer responds better to FAK inhibition than does PTEN wild-type cancer. Therefore, PTEN could be a biomarker for predicting response to FAK-targeted therapy during clinical development.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesHumansHydroxamic AcidsImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMice, NudeMutationNeovascularization, PathologicPhosphorylationPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1AminopyridinesFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesGSK2256098Hydroxamic AcidsKi-67 AntigenPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25833835
PMCPMC4458384
OpenAlexW2128528835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.