Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833668›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

Community-based physical activity interventions among women: a systematic review.

Leila Amiri Farahani, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Eesa Mohammadi, Soroor Parvizy, Ali Akbar Haghdoost, Ziba Taghizadeh

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Factors Influencing Physical Activity Participation among Midlife Immigrant Women: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Does Spousal Support Can Increase the Women's Physical Activity?International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Leila Amiri FarahaniDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen Asadi-LariDG Int'l Relations Department, MOHME, IR Iran Head- Oncopathology Research Centre, IUMS, Tehran, Iran.
Eesa MohammadiNursing Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Soroor ParvizyDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Centre for educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS) Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Akbar HaghdoostThe Research Centre for Modelling in Health, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Ziba TaghizadehFaculty Member of Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Centre, Nursing and Midwifery School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRMinistry of Health and Medical Education · IRTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReview and assess the effectiveness of community-based physical activity interventions among women aged 18-65 years.

designSystematic review

methodsTo find relevant articles, the researcher selected reports published in English between 1 January 2000 and 31 March 2013. Systematic search was to find controlled-trial studies that were conducted to uncover the effect of community-based interventions to promote physical activity among women 18-65 years of age, in which physical activity was reported as one of the measured outcomes. The methodological quality assessment was performed using a critical appraisal sheet. Also, the levels of evidence were assessed for the types of interventions.

resultsThe literature search identified nine articles. Four of the studies were randomised and the others studies had high methodological quality. There was no evidence, on the basis of effectiveness, for social cognitive theory-based interventions and inconclusive evidence of effectiveness for the rest of interventions.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of community-based interventions for enhancing physical activity among women. There is a need for high-quality randomised clinical trials with adequate statistical power to determine whether multicomponent and community-based intervention programmes increase physical activity among women, as well as to determine what type of interventions have a more effective and sustainable impact on women's physical activity.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityWomenCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth PromotionHumans

Identifiers

PMID25833668
PMCPMC4390687
OpenAlexW2323662426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.