Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833351›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Preoperative risk stratification using metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with endometrial cancer.

Kazuhiro Kitajima, Yuko Suenaga, Yoshiko Ueno, Tetsuo Maeda, Yasuhiko Ebina, Hideto Yamada, Takashi Okunaga, Kazuhiro Kubo, Keitarou Sofue, Tomonori Kanda and 2 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pretreatment volume-basedJapanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Predicting aggressive disease and poor outcome in endometrial cancer using preoperative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Evaluation of PreoperativeMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Japanese journal of radiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prognostic impact of primary tumor SUVMolecular and clinical oncology · 2016
    Article
  20. Primary tumor SUVMolecular and clinical oncology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kazuhiro KitajimaDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, kitajima@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
Yuko Suenaga
Yoshiko Ueno
Tetsuo Maeda
Yasuhiko Ebina
Hideto Yamada
Takashi Okunaga
Kazuhiro Kubo
Keitarou Sofue
Tomonori Kanda
Yukihisa Tamaki
Kazuro Sugimura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the usefulness of metabolic parameters obtained by (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative stratification of high-risk and low-risk endometrial carcinomas.

methodsPreoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 56 women with endometrial cancer. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumours were compared with clinicopathological features of surgical specimens. Diagnostic performance in terms of differentiation of low-risk disease (endometrioid histology, histological grade 1 or 2, invasion of less than half of the myometrium, and FIGO stage I) from high-risk disease was assessed.

resultsMTV and TLG were significantly higher in patients with higher histological grade (p = 0.0026 and p = 0.034), larger tumour size (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0017), lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI; p = 0.012 and p = 0.0051), myometrial invasion (p = 0.027 and p = 0.031), cervical stromal invasion (p = 0.023 and p = 0.014), ovarian metastasis (p = 0.00022 and p = 0.00034), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001), and higher FIGO stage (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.00048). SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with larger tumour size (p = 0.0025), LVSI (p = 0.00023) and myometrial invasion (p < 0.0001). The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for distinguishing high-risk from low-risk carcinoma were 0.625, 0.829 and 0.797 for SUVmax, MTV and TLG, respectively. AUCs for both MTV and TLG were significantly larger than that for SUVmax (p = 0.0049 and p = 0.021). The optimal TLG cut-off value of 70.2, determined by ROC analysis, was found to have 72.0% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity for risk stratification.

conclusionMTV and TLG of primary endometrial cancer show better correlations with clinicopathological features and are more useful for differentiating high-risk from low-risk carcinoma than SUVmax.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.