Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833241›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2015

Experimental evolution gone wild.

M Scheinin, U Riebesell, T A Rynearson, K T Lohbeck, S Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Eco-evolutionary consequences of habitat warming and fragmentation in communities.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evolutionary consequences of multidriver environmental change in an aquatic primary producer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  12. The role of intraspecific variation in the ecological and evolutionary success of diatoms in changing environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms and ocean global change.Nature microbiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Estuarine, coastal and shelf science · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rapid adaptation of harmful cyanobacteria to rising CO2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M ScheininGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Kiel, Germany Tvärminne Zoological Station, University of Helsinki, J. A. Palménin tie 260, Hanko, Finland.
U RiebesellGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Kiel, Germany.
T A RynearsonGraduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI, USA.
K T LohbeckGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Kiel, Germany.
S CollinsInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King's Building's, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK s.collins@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of their large population sizes and rapid cell division rates, marine microbes have, or can generate, ample variation to fuel evolution over a few weeks or months, and subsequently have the potential to evolve in response to global change. Here we measure evolution in the marine diatom Skeletonema marinoi evolved in a natural plankton community in CO2-enriched mesocosms deployed in situ. Mesocosm enclosures are typically used to study how the species composition and biogeochemistry of marine communities respond to environmental shifts, but have not been used for experimental evolution to date. Using this approach, we detect a large evolutionary response to CO2 enrichment in a focal marine diatom, where population growth rate increased by 1.3-fold in high CO2-evolved lineages. This study opens an exciting new possibility of carrying out in situ evolution experiments to understand how marine microbial communities evolve in response to environmental change.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemAquatic OrganismsCarbon DioxideCell ProliferationDiatomsGenetic ResearchGenetic VariationResearch DesignCarbon Dioxidecarbon dioxidediatom evolutionexperimental evolutionin situ mesocosmsocean acidificationSkeletonema

Identifiers

PMID25833241
PMCPMC4424681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.