ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2015
Accuracy of the Michaelis-Menten approximation when analysing effects of molecular noise.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biochemical necroptosis model explains cell-type-specific responses to cell death cues.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Universally valid reduction of multiscale stochastic biochemical systems using simple non-elementary propensities.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Three-dimensional stochastic simulation of chemoattractant-mediated excitability in cells.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- pSpatiocyte: a high-performance simulator for intracellular reaction-diffusion systems.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Revisiting the Reduction of Stochastic Models of Genetic Feedback Loops with Fast Promoter Switching.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Spatial Stochastic Intracellular Kinetics: A Review of Modelling Approaches.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2019Review
- Reduction of multiscale stochastic biochemical reaction networks using exact moment derivation.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- GillesPy: A Python Package for Stochastic Model Building and Simulation.IEEE life sciences letters · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative biology relies on the construction of accurate mathematical models, yet the effectiveness of these models is often predicated on making simplifying approximations that allow for direct comparisons with available experimental data. The Michaelis-Menten (MM) approximation is widely used in both deterministic and discrete stochastic models of intracellular reaction networks, owing to the ubiquity of enzymatic activity in cellular processes and the clear biochemical interpretation of its parameters. However, it is not well understood how the approximation applies to the discrete stochastic case or how it extends to spatially inhomogeneous systems. We study the behaviour of the discrete stochastic MM approximation as a function of system size and show that significant errors can occur for small volumes, in comparison with a corresponding mass-action system. We then explore some consequences of these results for quantitative modelling. One consequence is that fluctuation-induced sensitivity, or stochastic focusing, can become highly exaggerated in models that make use of MM kinetics even if the approximations are excellent in a deterministic model. Another consequence is that spatial stochastic simulations based on the reaction-diffusion master equation can become highly inaccurate if the model contains MM terms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.