Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833240›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2015

Accuracy of the Michaelis-Menten approximation when analysing effects of molecular noise.

Michael J Lawson, Linda Petzold, Andreas Hellander

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael J LawsonDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 337, Uppsala 75105, Sweden.
Linda PetzoldDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5070, USA.
Andreas HellanderDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Box 337, Uppsala 75105, Sweden andreas.hellander@it.uu.se.

Funding

StochSS: A Next-Generation Toolkit for Simulation-Driven Biological DiscoveryR01EB014877 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PETZOLD, LINDA R. · 2012 to 2022
$3.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014877NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB014877-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative biology relies on the construction of accurate mathematical models, yet the effectiveness of these models is often predicated on making simplifying approximations that allow for direct comparisons with available experimental data. The Michaelis-Menten (MM) approximation is widely used in both deterministic and discrete stochastic models of intracellular reaction networks, owing to the ubiquity of enzymatic activity in cellular processes and the clear biochemical interpretation of its parameters. However, it is not well understood how the approximation applies to the discrete stochastic case or how it extends to spatially inhomogeneous systems. We study the behaviour of the discrete stochastic MM approximation as a function of system size and show that significant errors can occur for small volumes, in comparison with a corresponding mass-action system. We then explore some consequences of these results for quantitative modelling. One consequence is that fluctuation-induced sensitivity, or stochastic focusing, can become highly exaggerated in models that make use of MM kinetics even if the approximations are excellent in a deterministic model. Another consequence is that spatial stochastic simulations based on the reaction-diffusion master equation can become highly inaccurate if the model contains MM terms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, ChemicalModels, StatisticalStochastic ProcessesComputer SimulationEnzyme ActivationEnzymesKineticsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise RatioSubstrate SpecificityEnzymesMichaelis–Mentenreaction–diffusion master equationstochastic models

Identifiers

PMID25833240
PMCPMC4424680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.