Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25833157›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015

Effect of Massachusetts healthcare reform on racial and ethnic disparities in admissions to hospital for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics.

Danny McCormick, Amresh D Hanchate, Karen E Lasser, Meredith G Manze, Mengyun Lin, Chieh Chu, Nancy R Kressin

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diabetes Control During Massachusetts Insurance Reform.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danny McCormickHarvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge, MA 02139, USA danny_mccormick@hms.harvard.edu.
Amresh D HanchateVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Karen E LasserSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Meredith G ManzeSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Mengyun LinSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Chieh ChuSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Nancy R KressinVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

Funding

Center for Health Insurance Reform, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and DisparitiesU01HL105342 · NHLBI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRESSIN, NANCY R. · 2010 to 2014
$5.6M
National Estimates for Inpatient Care, Outcomes & Hospital Effect among HispanicsR01MD007705 · NIMHD · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI HANCHATE, AMRESH D · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1U01HL105342-01NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the impact of Massachusetts healthcare reform on changes in rates of admission to hospital for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), which are potentially preventable with good access to outpatient medical care, and racial and ethnic disparities in such rates, using complete inpatient discharge data (hospital episode statistics) from Massachusetts and three control states.

designDifference in differences analysis to identify the change, overall and according to race/ethnicity, adjusted for secular changes unrelated to reform.

settingHospitals in Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, United States.

participantsAdults aged 18-64 (those most likely to have been affected by the reform) admitted for any of 12 ACSCs in the 21 months before and after the period during which reform was implemented (July 2006 to December 2007).

main outcome measuresAdmission rates for a composite of all 12 ACSCs, and subgroup composites of acute and chronic ACSCs.

resultsAfter adjustment for potential confounders, including age, race and ethnicity, sex, and county income, unemployment rate and physician supply, we found no evidence of a change in the admission rate for overall composite ACSC (1.2%, 95% confidence interval -1.6% to 4.1%) or for subgroup composites of acute and chronic ACSCs. Nor did we find a change in disparities in admission rates between black and white people (-1.9%, -8.5% to 5.1%) or white and Hispanic people (2.0%, -7.5% to 12.4%) for overall composite ACSC that existed in Massachusetts before reform. In analyses limited to Massachusetts only, we found no evidence of a change in admission rate for overall composite ACSC between counties with higher and lower rates of uninsurance at baseline (1.4%, -2.3% to 5.3%).

conclusionsMassachusetts reform was not associated with significantly lower overall or racial and ethnic disparities in rates of admission to hospital for ACSCs. In the US, and Massachusetts in particular, additional efforts might be needed to improve access to outpatient care and reduce preventable admissions.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareBlack or African AmericanHealth Care ReformHispanic or LatinoWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedNew Jersey

Identifiers

PMID25833157
PMCPMC4382709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.