Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015
Heart rate recovery and aerobic endurance capacity in cancer survivors: interdependence and exercise-induced improvements.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic and diagnostic utility of heart rate variability to predict and understand change in cancer and chemotherapy related fatigue, pain, and neuropathic symptoms: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of different doses of supervised aerobic exercise on heart rate recovery in inactive adults who are overweight or obese: results from E-MECHANIC.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Trial
- Aerobic capacity attainment and reasons for cardiopulmonary exercise test termination in people with cancer: a descriptive, retrospective analysis from a single laboratory.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: The St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2020Article
- Heart rate variability and heart rate recovery in lung cancer survivors eligible for long-term cure.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2019Article
- Heart Rate Variability as a Prognostic Factor for Cancer Survival - A Systematic Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhilst evidence supports beneficial effects of exercise on heart rate variability in cancer patients, its impact on heart rate recovery (HRR) and possible associations of exercise capacity and HRR have not yet been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the effects of an exercise intervention on HRR in relation to the baseline aerobic capacity.
methodsCancer patients (n = 309, 178 females) performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test at baseline and at a 4-month interval follow-up with home-based and supervised exercise programs in-between. VO2 and heart rate were assessed during and HRR at 60 and 120 s after test termination. Based on a median split of the VO2 peak baseline values, participants were dichotomized into two groups: below median (47 female; 57.5 ± 10 years) and above median (48 female; 54.3 ± 12 years).
resultsIn the baseline sample (n = 309), VO2 peak correlated significantly with HRR60 (r = .327, p < .01) and HRR120 (r = .524, p < .01). For the compliers who completed intervention and assessments (n = 158), group comparisons demonstrated differences between below median versus above median group in absolute changes of HRR60 (3.1 ± 10.5 bpm (95% CI +0.6; +5.4) vs -1.8 ± 8.7 bpm (95% CI -3.7; +0.5)) and VO2 peak (2.9 ± 3.5 ml/kg/min (95% CI +2.1; +3.7) vs 0.66 ± 4 ml/kg/min (95% CI -0.6; +1.5)) (p < .01), but not in HRR120 (3.9 ± 11.8 bpm (95% CI +1.2; +6.6) vs 0.8 ± 10.8 bpm (95% CI -1.7; +3.5); p > .05).
conclusionsThese findings point toward a positive linear relationship between aerobic capacity and vagal reactivation in cancer patients. Patients with initial VO2 peak values below median showed improved VO2 peak, HRR60 and HRR120 following the moderate aerobic exercise intervention and differences to patients above median in all outcomes compared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.