ReviewDrug safety2015
Chimeric fusion proteins used for therapy: indications, mechanisms, and safety.
Review in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- PDBe-SIFTS: An open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Fusion Protein Technology to Enhance Pharmacological Properties of L-Asparaginases.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- PDBe-SIFTS: an open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Development of Bispecific Antibody Targeting Human IL-17A and IL-6.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Novel biopharmaceutical strategies: Fc-fusion protein technology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals.Analytical science advances · 2025Review
- Chimeric hBPIArchives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Strategies to Enhance Protein Delivery.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Review
- Adaptation of the binding domain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Advancing Biologic Therapy for Refractory Autoimmune Hepatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Sustained Drug Release from Smart Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
- Treating Bladder Cancer: Engineering of Current and Next Generation Antibody-, Fusion Protein-, mRNA-, Cell- and Viral-Based Therapeutics.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Understanding the Targeting Mechanisms of Multi-Specific Biologics in Immunotherapy with Multiscale Modeling.iScience · 2020Article
- Considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for novel pharmaceutical modalities.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2020Review
- Harnessing biomolecules for bioinspired dental biomaterials.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Review
- Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- The pharmacology and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric fusion proteins, produced by genetic engineering, are currently made up of effector peptides, for example, a ligand-binding portion of a cytokine or growth factor, extracellular domains of lymphocyte antigens, or a toxin linked to a suitable fusion partner. This review covers eight fusion proteins that have received regulatory approval for human therapy: etanercept, belatacept, abatacept, alefacept, rilonacept, romiplostim, aflibercept, and denileukin-diftitox. Important requirements for an effective fusion protein are effective targeting and binding, cytotoxicity, and a stable molecule with an extended half-life. The Fc region of human IgG1 is generally chosen as the fusion partner for the effector molecule(s) because it extends the fusion protein half-life by recycling via the salvage neonatal FcRn receptor and protects the molecule from lysosomal degradation. Each of the fusion proteins has IgG1 Fc as a fusion partner except denileukin-diftitox, which employs a modified diphtheria toxin effector peptide linked to interleukin-2. For six of the Fc fusion proteins, the effector peptide(s) is linked to the N-terminus of the Fc piece but for the thrombopoietin-mimetic romiplostim, linkage is through the C-terminus. Although some clear type I and IV hypersensitivities are known to be induced by fusion protein therapy, the pathomechanisms underlying many adverse hematologic, respiratory, renal, and cutaneous events have generally not been investigated. Assessment of immunogenicity risk is important because a number of immune-based, or influenced, adverse reactions such as anaphylaxis, cutaneous manifestations, infusion, and injection-site reactions, and cytokine release syndrome can occur. Features of many reactions, some autoimmune in nature, suggest type II, III, or IV hypersensitivities. Clinical findings with the anti-arthritis anti-psoriasis biologic etanercept provide the largest body of current knowledge of fusion protein-induced adverse events. For most fusion proteins, little information is available on appropriate diagnostic and desensitization procedures for hypersensitivity and other adverse responses, although skin test concentrations and some successful desensitization protocols have been published for etanercept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.