Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25832646›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2016

A survey of current trends in computational drug repositioning.

Jiao Li, Si Zheng, Bin Chen, Atul J Butte, S Joshua Swamidass, Zhiyong Lu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03269474 (Computational Drug Repurposing for All Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex), which is not on this map. Cited by 241 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
51.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03269474 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Computational Drug Repurposing for All Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex (EBS) Cases

TypeobservationalSponsorJoyce TengRan2017 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsEpidermolysis Bullosa, Healthy, Genetic Skin Disease, Epidermolysis Bullosa SimplexArmsExperimental Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 573 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiao Li
Si Zheng
Bin Chen
Atul J Butte
S Joshua Swamidass
Zhiyong Lu
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCourtesy Associates · US

Funding

Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
Repositioning drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancerR01GM079719 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational drug repositioning or repurposing is a promising and efficient tool for discovering new uses from existing drugs and holds the great potential for precision medicine in the age of big data. The explosive growth of large-scale genomic and phenotypic data, as well as data of small molecular compounds with granted regulatory approval, is enabling new developments for computational repositioning. To achieve the shortest path toward new drug indications, advanced data processing and analysis strategies are critical for making sense of these heterogeneous molecular measurements. In this review, we show recent advancements in the critical areas of computational drug repositioning from multiple aspects. First, we summarize available data sources and the corresponding computational repositioning strategies. Second, we characterize the commonly used computational techniques. Third, we discuss validation strategies for repositioning studies, including both computational and experimental methods. Finally, we highlight potential opportunities and use-cases, including a few target areas such as cancers. We conclude with a brief discussion of the remaining challenges in computational drug repositioning.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyData MiningDrug CombinationsDrug RepositioningGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMolecular StructurePhenotypeSurveys and QuestionnairesDrug Combinationschemical structurecomputational drug repositioningdrug combinationgenomeintegrative strategiesphenomeprediction validation

Identifiers

PMID25832646
PMCPMC4719067
OpenAlexW2151357092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.