Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25832298›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Evidence for human norovirus infection of dogs in the United kingdom.

Sarah L Caddy, Alexis de Rougemont, Edward Emmott, Laila El-Attar, Judy A Mitchell, Michael Hollinshead, Gael Belliot, Joe Brownlie, Jacques Le Pendu, Ian Goodfellow

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identification of a novel canine norovirus.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Natural Norovirus Infections in Rhesus Macaques.Emerging infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah L CaddyDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom Section of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom slc50@cam.ac.uk.
Alexis de RougemontNational Reference Centre for Enteric Viruses, Laboratory of Virology, University Hospital of Dijon, University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-9414
Edward EmmottDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laila El-AttarDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Judy A MitchellDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Michael HollinsheadDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gael BelliotNational Reference Centre for Enteric Viruses, Laboratory of Virology, University Hospital of Dijon, University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Joe BrownlieDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Jacques Le PenduINSERM, U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Ian GoodfellowDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 097997Wellcome Trust WT097997MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human noroviruses (HuNoVs) are a major cause of viral gastroenteritis, with an estimated 3 million cases per year in the United Kingdom. HuNoVs have recently been isolated from pet dogs in Europe (M. Summa, C.-H. von Bonsdorff, and L. Maunula, J Clin Virol 53:244-247, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.12.014), raising concerns about potential zoonotic infections. With 31% of United Kingdom households owning a dog, this could prove to be an important transmission route. To examine this risk, canine tissues were studied for their ability to bind to HuNoV in vitro. In addition, canine stool samples were analyzed for the presence of viral nucleic acid, and canine serum samples were tested for the presence of anti-HuNoV antibodies. The results showed that seven different genotypes of HuNoV virus-like particles (VLPs) can bind to canine gastrointestinal tissue, suggesting that infection is at least theoretically possible. Although HuNoV RNA was not identified in stool samples from 248 dogs, serological evidence of previous exposure to HuNoV was obtained in 43/325 canine serum samples. Remarkably, canine seroprevalence for different HuNoV genotypes mirrored the seroprevalence in the human population. Though entry and replication within cells have not been demonstrated, the canine serological data indicate that dogs produce an immune response to HuNoV, implying productive infection. In conclusion, this study reveals zoonotic implications for HuNoV, and to elucidate the significance of this finding, further epidemiological and molecular investigations will be essential.

Indexed as

Caliciviridae InfectionsNorovirusZoonosesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDogsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansSalivaSeroepidemiologic StudiesUnited KingdomVirionAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID25832298
PMCPMC4432062
OpenAlexW2150183104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.