Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25832111›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2015

Therapeutic alliance in antidepressant treatment: cause or effect of symptomatic levels?

Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Steven P Roose, Jacques P Barber, Bret R Rutherford

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Placebo Responders in Late-Life Depression Trials.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2018
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Placebo and the law of identification.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychiatry in the Digital Age: A Blessing or a Curse?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. New analytic strategies help answer the controversial question of whether alliance is therapeutic in itself.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sigal Zilcha-ManoDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Steven P Roose
Jacques P Barber
Bret R Rutherford

Funding

Placebo Effects in the Treatment of Depression: Cognitive and Neural MechanismsK23MH085236 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI RUTHERFORD, BRET R · 2010 to 2014
$883k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH085236NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH081306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that in psychotherapy alliance is a predictor of symptomatic change, even while accounting for the temporal precedence between alliance and symptoms. However, the extent to which alliance predicts outcomes in psychopharmacology is yet to be fully investigated considering the fact that alliance can be the result, rather than the cause, of symptomatic change. The current prospective study examined whether the alliance predicts outcomes in psychopharmacology, while controlling for previous symptomatic change throughout the course of treatment.

methodsData from a psychopharmacological randomized controlled trial for the treatment of adult major depression (n = 42), including the patients' rating of the alliance with the physicians, were analyzed. Multilevel models controlling for autoregressive lag of the dependent variable were used in all analyses to examine the effect of alliance on outcome.

resultsThe effect of alliance on outcome, while controlling for prior symptomatic levels, was significant and restricted to the middle phase of treatment (week 4, p = 0.005), when most of the reductions in symptoms were observed. Exploratory analyses of the differences between placebo and medication conditions suggest that the differences between the patients in their average alliance levels predicted a greater reduction in symptoms in the placebo compared to the medication conditions (p = 0.008). The main limitation is the small cohort size.

conclusionsThe findings suggest an effect of alliance on outcome in psychopharmacology, which is not merely the result of previous symptomatic levels. This effect may be more robust in conditions that do not include active treatment (placebo), possibly serving as a compensatory effect.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychopharmacologyTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25832111
PMCPMC4417334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.