ArticleMedical physics2015
Systematic calibration of an integrated x-ray and optical tomography system for preclinical radiation research.
Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mobile bioluminescence tomography-guided system for pre-clinical radiotherapy research.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Quantitative molecular bioluminescence tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Quantitative Bioluminescence Tomography-Guided Conformal Irradiation for Preclinical Radiation Research.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- In Vivo Bioluminescence Tomography Center of Mass-Guided Conformal Irradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020Article
- Technical feasibility of [Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019Article
- The Path Toward PET-Guided Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma in Laboratory Animals: A Mini Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Review
- Plasmonic Optical Imaging of Gold Nanorods Localization in Small Animals.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The changing paradigm of tumour response to irradiation.The British journal of radiology · 2017Review
- Evaluation of On- and Off-Line Bioluminescence Tomography System for Focal Irradiation Guidance.Radiation research · 2016Article
- Systematic study of target localization for bioluminescence tomography guided radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2016Article
- An image guided small animal stereotactic radiotherapy system.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Bioluminescence Tomography-Guided Radiation Therapy for Preclinical Research.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2016Article
- Differentiation and Localization of Adjacent Murine Tumors Using X-ray and Bioluminescence Tomography.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) has been developed for focal tumor irradiation, allowing laboratory researchers to test basic biological hypotheses that can modify radiotherapy outcomes in ways that were not feasible previously. CBCT provides excellent bone to soft tissue contrast, but is incapable of differentiating tumors from surrounding soft tissue. Bioluminescence tomography (BLT), in contrast, allows direct visualization of even subpalpable tumors and quantitative evaluation of tumor response. Integration of BLT with CBCT offers complementary image information, with CBCT delineating anatomic structures and BLT differentiating luminescent tumors. This study is to develop a systematic method to calibrate an integrated CBCT and BLT imaging system which can be adopted onboard the SARRP to guide focal tumor irradiation.
methodsThe integrated imaging system consists of CBCT, diffuse optical tomography (DOT), and BLT. The anatomy acquired from CBCT and optical properties acquired from DOT serve as a priori information for the subsequent BLT reconstruction. Phantoms were designed and procedures were developed to calibrate the CBCT, DOT/BLT, and the entire integrated system. Geometrical calibration was performed to calibrate the CBCT system. Flat field correction was performed to correct the nonuniform response of the optical imaging system. Absolute emittance calibration was performed to convert the camera readout to the emittance at the phantom or animal surface, which enabled the direct reconstruction of the bioluminescence source strength. Phantom and mouse imaging were performed to validate the calibration.
resultsAll calibration procedures were successfully performed. Both CBCT of a thin wire and a euthanized mouse revealed no spatial artifact, validating the accuracy of the CBCT calibration. The absolute emittance calibration was validated with a 650 nm laser source, resulting in a 3.0% difference between simulated and measured signal. The calibration of the entire system was confirmed through the CBCT and BLT reconstruction of a bioluminescence source placed inside a tissue-simulating optical phantom. Using a spatial region constraint, the source position was reconstructed with less than 1 mm error and the source strength reconstructed with less than 24% error.
conclusionsA practical and systematic method has been developed to calibrate an integrated x-ray and optical tomography imaging system, including the respective CBCT and optical tomography system calibration and the geometrical calibration of the entire system. The method can be modified and adopted to calibrate CBCT and optical tomography systems that are operated independently or hybrid x-ray and optical tomography imaging systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.